Nozzle Assembly for Uranium Ore Ablation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for uranium recovery from low-grade ores are environmentally and operationally challenging, requiring reagents that can contaminate aquifers and are impractical for impermeable or shallow formations, and often result in significant waste production.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a pressurized fluid conduit and adjustable nozzle assembly to ablate heterogeneous uranium-bearing materials, separating them into distinct fractions through kinetic collisions, allowing for the recovery of uranium without chemical reagents and reducing material processing volumes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If chemical reagents are used for separation, then separation effectiveness is improved, but environmental contamination and operational complexity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation effectivenessVSAvoidenvironmental contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical separation reagents with a mechanical ablation system that uses pressurized fluid jets to physically remove material. The system employs nozzles that direct high-pressure fluid streams at target material, utilizing mechanical force and fluid dynamics to achieve separation without chemical reactions, thereby eliminating environmental contamination from chemical reagents while maintaining separation effectiveness through physical means

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If conventional processing methods are used, then material recovery is achieved, but processing volume and waste production increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial recoveryVSAvoidwaste production
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes only the necessary material fractions through targeted ablation. The system selectively removes material based on physical properties such as density and composition, extracting only the bearing fractions containing valuable materials while leaving non-bearing fractions intact. This selective extraction approach significantly reduces waste production compared to conventional methods that process entire material volumes, thereby improving productivity efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes changes in physical parameters including fluid pressure, flow rate, and nozzle configuration to optimize the ablation process. By adjusting these parameters, the system achieves effective material recovery with minimal waste. The pressurized fluid systems operate at controlled pressures and flow rates that enable selective removal of target materials while preserving non-bearing fractions, reducing overall processing volume and waste generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If chemical reagents are used for uranium recovery, then recovery efficiency is improved, but operational complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery efficiencyVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex chemical recovery processes with a simplified mechanical ablation system. The equipment consists primarily of pressurized fluid sources, nozzles, and collection systems, eliminating the need for complex chemical reagent handling, storage, and disposal infrastructure. This mechanical approach reduces operational complexity while maintaining recovery efficiency through physical separation mechanisms that are easier to control and monitor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional methods are used for low-grade ores, then processing is feasible, but economic viability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing feasibilityVSAvoideconomic viability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables economic processing of low-grade ores by extracting only the valuable bearing fractions through selective ablation. The system identifies and removes material containing target elements based on physical property differences, concentrating the valuable components into smaller volumes. This extraction approach transforms low-grade ores into economically viable materials by removing the bulk non-bearing material, making processing feasible and profitable where conventional methods fail

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adjusts processing parameters including fluid pressure, flow rate, and nozzle configuration to optimize extraction from low-grade materials. By fine-tuning these parameters, the system achieves efficient recovery of valuable components from low-concentration materials. The ability to control ablation intensity and duration allows economical processing of low-grade ores, improving productivity viability while maintaining processing feasibility through parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively separates uranium-bearing fractions from non-bearing fractions, reducing environmental impact and operational costs, and enables recovery from low-grade ores that were previously uneconomical, with high uranium concentration achieved in a smaller material volume.

Implementation Method 1

passing the fluid stream through an adjustable nozzle, impacting the fluid stream with another fluid stream at an oblique angle to ablate the heterogeneous particles of the material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectKinetic collision: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

a nozzle assembly in fluid communication with the conduit, and a separation system configured to separate particles of a heterogeneous material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Data Source

PatentUS9914132B2Devices, systems, and methods for processing heterogeneous materials
Publication Date: 2018.03.13 DISA TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US9914132B2 patent drawing
  • US9914132B2 patent drawing
  • US9914132B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for processing a heterogeneous material includes a conduit for a pressurized fluid and a nozzle assembly in fluid communication with the conduit. The nozzle assembly includes a plurality of adjustable nozzles configured such that fluid streams passing through each nozzle intersect at an oblique angle after passing through the nozzles. At least one of the fluid streams comprises a heterogeneous material. A method of processing a heterogeneous material includes entraining heterogeneous particles into at least one fluid stream, passing the fluid stream through an adjustable nozzle, impacting the fluid stream with another fluid stream at an oblique angle to ablate the heterogeneous particles, and classifying the heterogeneous particles.