Liquid Ejecting Apparatus Nozzle Bubble Mixing Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In ink jet printers, the mixing of bubbles into nozzles during the wiping process after cleaning can lead to deteriorated ink ejecting properties, as the pressure of ink in nozzles is maintained at negative pressure to prevent ink flow, potentially causing erroneous wiping and bubble introduction.

Innovation Solution

A liquid ejecting apparatus that creates a pressure difference between internal and external pressures in nozzles, allowing for controlled discharging and leaking processes to prevent bubble mixing, with a wiping process performed while maintaining higher internal pressure than external pressure to prevent bubble introduction, and using a cap to form a closed space for targeted discharging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the pressure of ink in nozzles is maintained at negative pressure to prevent ink flow, then ink leakage is prevented, but bubbles can be pressed into the nozzles during wiping causing erroneous wiping and deteriorated ejecting properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveink leakage preventionVSAvoidbubble introduction during wiping
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically changes the pressure state of the nozzle from negative pressure during normal operation to positive pressure during wiping. The pressure difference causing unit adjusts the internal pressure to be higher than external pressure specifically during the wiping process, transforming the static negative pressure system into a dynamic one that adapts to operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by creating positive pressure in the nozzle before the wiping process begins. This preliminary pressure adjustment ensures that when the wiper contacts the nozzle, bubbles cannot be pressed inward, preventing erroneous wiping before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If cleaning is executed on all nozzle groups, then ejecting properties are maintained, but liquid consumption increases unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejecting properties maintenanceVSAvoidliquid consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the treatment of different nozzle groups. Instead of uniform cleaning across all nozzles, the system identifies and applies cleaning only to specific nozzle groups that require it, based on their individual ejecting properties. This localized approach maintains reliability while reducing unnecessary liquid consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by performing cleaning on only a portion of the nozzle groups rather than all nozzles. The control unit determines which specific nozzle groups require cleaning based on their ejecting properties, applying the cleaning function partially to achieve the necessary maintenance effect while minimizing liquid usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If wiping is performed from a cleaned nozzle group side toward an uncleaned nozzle group side, then dried nozzle forming face wiping is avoided, but bubble mixing in nozzles occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedried nozzle forming face wiping preventionVSAvoidbubble mixing in nozzles
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the pressure parameter from negative to positive during the wiping process. This parameter change reverses the pressure gradient that normally causes bubbles to be pressed into nozzles, ensuring that even when wiping direction is fixed, bubbles cannot enter the nozzle interior regardless of the pressure differential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively suppresses bubble mixing in nozzles during wiping, maintains ink quality, and reduces unnecessary liquid consumption by selectively targeting nozzle groups with ejecting failures, while allowing for efficient liquid discharge and reduced scattering.

Implementation Method 1

a pressure difference causing unit which causes a pressure difference so that the internal pressure is higher than the external pressure in nozzles included in one or more nozzle groups among the plurality of nozzle groups

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9375932B2Liquid ejecting apparatus
Publication Date: 2016.06.28 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US9375932B2 patent drawing
  • US9375932B2 patent drawing
  • US9375932B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid ejecting apparatus performs a wiping process for wiping a nozzle forming face while a leaking process for leaking liquid from a plurality of nozzle groups is performed by setting a pressure difference to a second pressure difference which is smaller than a first pressure difference, after performing a discharging process for discharging liquid from a part of nozzle groups among the plurality of nozzle groups by setting the pressure difference to the first pressure difference, when a difference which is obtained by subtracting an external pressure which is a pressure in a space to which a nozzle is open from an internal pressure which is a pressure of liquid in the nozzle included in the plurality of nozzle groups which eject liquid is set to the pressure difference.