Fluid Droplet Ejection Nozzle Subset Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluid droplet ejection devices require lengthy inspection processes, which can lead to prolonged printing times and print defects if not all nozzles are inspected, as they typically inspect every nozzle individually.

Innovation Solution

A method that divides ejection nozzles into subsets based on the number required to form the smallest printing width, allowing for targeted inspections and changing the subset of nozzles inspected after each specific amount of printing is completed, thereby shortening inspection time and preventing print defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If every ejection nozzle is inspected individually, then print defects are minimized, but inspection time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint qualityVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the ejection nozzles into multiple subsets, where each subset contains a specific number of nozzles that can collectively form the smallest printing width. Instead of inspecting each nozzle individually, the system inspects subsets of nozzles, segmenting the inspection process into manageable groups that reduce overall inspection time while maintaining print quality through functional equivalence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of time

If a subset of nozzles is inspected, then inspection time is reduced, but print defects may occur if uninspected nozzles malfunction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection timeVSAvoidprint quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by ensuring that each nozzle subset inspected has the specific property of being capable of forming the smallest printing width. This means that while not all nozzles are inspected simultaneously, each inspected subset possesses the local capability to produce acceptable print output, thereby maintaining overall print quality even when only a portion of nozzles is checked.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If cleaning is performed frequently, then nozzle reliability is maintained, but productivity decreases due to lost printing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenozzle functionVSAvoidprinting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service mechanism where the system autonomously determines when cleaning is necessary based on inspection results. Instead of performing cleaning at fixed intervals or proactively, the system waits until actual nozzle malfunction is detected through subset inspections, then performs cleaning only for the affected subsets. This on-demand approach allows the system to service itself efficiently without unnecessary interruptions to printing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10065430B2Fluid droplet ejection device and ejection inspection method
Publication Date: 2018.09.04 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US10065430B2 patent drawing
  • US10065430B2 patent drawing
  • US10065430B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A print unit prints by ejecting fluid droplets from a plurality of nozzles while moving in a primary scanning direction relative to a print medium. An ejection inspection unit inspects fluid droplet ejection by a group of target nozzles, which are part of an ejection nozzle subset obtained by dividing the nozzles according to the number of nozzles required to form the smallest printing width in the secondary scanning direction. A control unit controls the print unit and the ejection inspection unit, and selects the group of target nozzles in the ejection nozzle subset and performs the ejection inspection each time a specific amount of printing is completed.