NR Flow-Control Feedback for Split Bearers and PDCP Duplication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network-based flow control mechanisms in LTE and NR systems lack support for uplink and secondary cell group (SCG) split-bearer operations, and face inefficiencies in PDCP duplication handling, leading to suboptimal scheduling and quality of service issues.

Innovation Solution

Enhancements to network-based flow control systems include support for uplink and SCG split-bearer operations, with mechanisms for PDCP PDU sequence number notifications and feedback triggering, using modified frame formats and new control procedures to optimize data delivery and avoid duplicative transmissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If network-based flow control mechanisms are used in LTE and NR systems, then data transmission is managed, but they lack support for uplink and SCG split-bearer operations leading to suboptimal scheduling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for uplink and SCG split-bearer operationsVSAvoidscheduling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the flow control mechanism into separate handling for different bearer types (MCG and SCG split-bearers). It introduces distinct feedback triggering mechanisms for each bearer type, allowing independent optimization. The PDCP duplication handling is also segmented with separate sequence number tracking for each bearer, enabling precise control over data flow paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic flow control by introducing feedback triggering mechanisms that adapt to real-time network conditions. The system dynamically adjusts flow control parameters based on buffer status, transmission conditions, and bearer-specific requirements. This allows the scheduling efficiency to be optimized continuously rather than using static configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If PDCP duplication handling is used, then data redundancy is created, but it leads to duplicative transmissions and quality of service issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata delivery reliabilityVSAvoidduplicative transmissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the receiving node sends acknowledgments and status information back to the transmitting node. This feedback includes information about successfully received packets and buffer status, allowing the transmitter to adjust duplication levels dynamically. The feedback loop enables the system to maintain reliability while minimizing duplicative transmissions by stopping duplication once acknowledgment is received.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces mechanisms to discard duplicate packets at the receiver side based on sequence number comparison. When a duplicate packet is detected, it is discarded without processing, and the receiver sends a single acknowledgment for the original packet. This prevents duplicative transmissions from consuming network resources while maintaining the reliability benefits of duplication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Productivity

If flow control triggering mechanisms are enhanced, then data delivery control is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata delivery efficiencyVSAvoidflow control mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing flow control triggering only where needed - specifically for SCG split-bearer operations and PDCP duplication scenarios. Rather than overhauling the entire flow control system, it adds targeted triggering mechanisms for specific problem areas. This selective approach improves data delivery efficiency without unnecessarily complicating the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs the flow control triggering mechanism to serve multiple functions: it triggers feedback for buffer status reporting, initiates flow control adjustments, and coordinates with PDCP duplication management. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized mechanisms, thereby improving productivity while limiting the increase in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250344186A1Devices and Methods for Flow-Control Triggering and Feedback
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 APPLE INC
  • US20250344186A1 patent drawing
  • US20250344186A1 patent drawing
  • US20250344186A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices, methods, communication nodes, base stations, storage media, and other embodiments are provided for managing associations in a communication network. In one example embodiment, a New Radio (NR) node is configured for NR user-plane protocol communications between a master node (MN) and a secondary node (SN). The NR node is configured to generate a downlink (DL) user data message with downlink user data, initiate transmission of the DL user data message to a second node, and process a DL data delivery status message from the second node in response to the DL user data message. In various embodiments, polling and SCG split-bearer configurations are supported by such messaging. In some embodiments, packet data convergence protocol (PDCP) serial numbers are communicated for transmission and retransmission management. In some embodiments, DL configurations initiated by an SN are enabled, as well as UL configurations initiated by either an MN or an SN.