NTN Signal Coverage Verification Through Secure NAS Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in verifying the integrity of signal coverage information, particularly in satellite networks, which can lead to incorrect network coverage determination, resulting in Denial of Service attacks or unnecessary power consumption due to tampered broadcast information.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for determining signal coverage information by comparing first signal coverage information received from a Non-Terrestrial Networks-Radio Access Network (NTN-RAN) with second signal coverage information obtained through secure transmission from a core network device, such as AMF, to ensure accurate network coverage determination and reduce power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If signal coverage information is obtained from broadcast information transmitted by NTN-RAN device, then the UE can determine network coverage, but the information may be tampered with leading to incorrect coverage determination and security vulnerabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal coverage information integrityVSAvoidDenial of Service attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The core network device acts as an intermediary that provides a second source of signal coverage information through secure NAS messages. This intermediary verification mechanism allows the UE to cross-check the broadcast information from NTN-RAN, preventing tampered information from causing security vulnerabilities or Denial of Service attacks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the UE compares signal coverage information from two sources (broadcast information and NAS message) and uses the consistent information for coverage determination. This feedback loop ensures that tampered information is detected and rejected, maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the UE continuously monitors signal coverage information to ensure accuracy, then coverage determination reliability improves, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage determination accuracyVSAvoidUE power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous monitoring, the system uses periodic actions where the UE receives signal coverage information through NAS messages at specific intervals or events (such as during configuration updates). This periodic verification maintains coverage determination accuracy while significantly reducing power consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The core network device proactively pushes signal coverage information to the UE through NAS messages, eliminating the need for the UE to continuously request or monitor coverage information. This self-service approach where the network provides information on-demand reduces UE power consumption while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If the UE uses only broadcast information for coverage determination, then the process is simple, but the system is vulnerable to tampered information and security attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage determination simplicityVSAvoidinformation integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges two information sources (broadcast information from NTN-RAN and secure NAS messages from core network) into a unified coverage determination process. The UE compares both sources and uses consistent information, maintaining operational simplicity while significantly improving information integrity and security against tampering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If the UE verifies signal coverage information through multiple sources, then information accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal coverage information accuracyVSAvoidUE processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process extracts and compares only the critical signal coverage information parameters from two sources, rather than analyzing entire message structures. This selective extraction approach maintains high measurement precision for coverage determination while minimizing UE processing complexity by focusing only on essential verification elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250310751A1Signal coverage information determination method and apparatus, communication device and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 BEIJING XIAOMI MOBILE SOFTWARE CO LTD
  • US20250310751A1 patent drawing
  • US20250310751A1 patent drawing
  • US20250310751A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a signal coverage information determination method and apparatus, a communication device, and a storage medium. User equipment (UE) receives broadcast information carrying first signal coverage information sent by a non-terrestrial network (NTN) access network device; the UE receives a non-access stratum (NAS) message carrying second signal coverage information sent by a core network device, the NAS message being related to a configuration update of the UE; and the UE determines third signal coverage information to be adopted by the UE on the basis of the first signal coverage information and the second signal coverage information.