Nuclear Imaging Appropriateness Middleware for Cardiovascular Risk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems face challenges in reliably and efficiently determining the appropriateness of nuclear imaging for cardiovascular risk management, due to complexities in scoring systems like the Framingham Risk Score, data availability issues, and the need for real-time decision-making, which leads to inefficiencies and increased costs in healthcare.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based middleware system integrated with Electronic Medical Records (EMR) that provides real-time clinical decision support, using rules-based processing and data mining to assess the appropriateness of nuclear imaging, incorporating structured and unstructured data, and justifying orders based on clinical guidelines for authorization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual calculation of Framingham Risk Score is used, then accuracy of risk assessment can be maintained, but time consumption and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of risk assessmentVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated calculations of the Framingham Risk Score by extracting relevant data from electronic medical records before the clinical decision-making process. This preliminary action computes the risk score in advance, eliminating the need for manual calculation during patient visits while maintaining accuracy through standardized algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An automated computing system acts as an intermediary between the electronic medical records and the clinician. This intermediary automatically retrieves patient data, calculates the Framingham Risk Score, and presents the results to the clinician, thereby eliminating manual calculation while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive data collection for Framingham Risk Score is performed, then reliability of nuclear imaging decision improves, but data availability requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of nuclear imaging decisionVSAvoiddata availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary extraction and organization of all necessary Framingham Risk Score components from electronic medical records before the clinical encounter. By gathering cholesterol levels, blood pressure, smoking status, and other required data in advance, the system ensures data availability without burdening the clinician during the decision-making moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system independently retrieves and processes all necessary patient data from the electronic medical records without requiring manual data collection from multiple sources. The system serves itself by automatically querying databases, extracting relevant information, and computing the risk score, thereby ensuring reliability without increasing data availability requirements for the clinician.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If automated decision support system is implemented, then productivity and cost efficiency improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated decision support system integrates multiple functions into a single platform: it extracts data from electronic medical records, calculates the Framingham Risk Score, determines appropriateness of nuclear imaging, and generates authorization documentation. This multi-functionality improves productivity without proportionally increasing complexity, as the system performs all tasks through a unified automated workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system serves as an intermediary layer between the electronic medical records and the clinician's decision-making process. It handles all complex data processing, calculation, and determination tasks automatically, presenting simplified results to the clinician. This intermediary approach masks the underlying system complexity while delivering productivity benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of time

If real-time decision support is provided, then loss of time is reduced, but computational requirements and system resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making timeVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data extraction and risk score calculation during routine electronic medical record updates or before scheduled appointments. By computing the Framingham Risk Score in advance rather than in real-time during the clinical encounter, the system reduces decision-making time without requiring intensive real-time computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11183280B2System and method for optimizing nuclear imaging appropriateness decisions
Publication Date: 2021.11.23 EMERGE CLINICAL SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US11183280B2 patent drawing
  • US11183280B2 patent drawing
  • US11183280B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems of accelerating the adoption of a medical treatment by healthcare providers are disclosed. The methods include providing to a healthcare provider a set of selectable criteria for determining whether a specific medical treatment is indicated for a particular patient, analyzing the criteria selected, and indicating to the healthcare provider whether the medical treatment is indicated. A system and methods are provided which are suitable for optimizing the use of nuclear imaging for assessing risks of cardiovascular disorders and, when appropriate, for implementing intervention strategies to reduce such risks.