Automated Nuclease Editing Enrichment via Cell Cycle Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for nucleic acid-guided nuclease gene editing face challenges in efficiently generating edits in cell populations and enriching for edited cells due to selective enrichment of unedited cells and growth biases resulting from double-strand DNA breaks and differential editing rates.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an automated high-throughput enrichment method that induces nucleic acid-guided nuclease editing at specific points in the cell growth cycle, using an inducible promoter to control the nuclease and gRNA, allowing cells to grow until they reach the stationary phase before editing, thereby overcoming growth biases and improving editing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If nucleic acid-guided nuclease editing is performed in conventional cell culture methods, then editing can be achieved, but unedited cells are selectively enriched due to lack of double-strand DNA breaks, reducing editing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveediting efficiencyVSAvoidcell population representation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by inducing nuclease expression before the editing step to create a pool of cells with varying editing statuses, then using flow cytometry to detect and sort edited cells based on DNA damage markers. This preliminary induction allows subsequent enrichment of truly edited cells while eliminating unedited cells that would otherwise be selectively enriched during conventional culture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If editing is performed during active cell growth, then cell proliferation occurs, but growth biases and fitness effects skew the representation of different edits in the population

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell population expansionVSAvoidedit frequency accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic action by synchronizing cell cultures to specific phases of the cell cycle before inducing nuclease expression. Cells are allowed to progress through defined growth phases, then editing is induced at a specific point, followed by detection and sorting. This periodic synchronization eliminates continuous growth biases while maintaining sufficient cell population expansion for accurate edit frequency measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Manufacturing precision

If double-strand DNA breaks are introduced during editing, then genome editing occurs, but cell viability is dramatically negatively impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenome editing precisionVSAvoidcell viability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses flow cytometry detection of DNA damage markers as an intermediary to identify cells that have successfully undergone editing without requiring them to survive prolonged culture. By detecting edited cells immediately after editing based on DNA damage signatures, the method captures editing events before viability loss eliminates them from the population, thus preserving both editing precision and cell viability information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11965154B2Detection of nuclease edited sequences in automated modules and instruments
Publication Date: 2024.04.23 INSCRIPTA INC
  • US11965154B2 patent drawing
  • US11965154B2 patent drawing
  • US11965154B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides modules, instruments and methods to enrich for cells edited via nucleic acid-guided nuclease editing of live cells.