Nucleator Blend Identification for Polyolefin Clarity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for preparing nucleated polyolefin materials require high processing temperatures due to the high melting points of nucleators, leading to increased energy consumption, longer cycle times, and potential nucleator sublimation, which complicates the production of plastics with desired optical clarity and mechanical properties.

Innovation Solution

Identifying a blend of nucleators with a specific weight ratio that exhibits lower minimum dissolution temperatures in polyolefin resins, allowing for effective nucleation and clarification at lower processing temperatures without compromising haze values or organoleptic properties, through a method involving the preparation and testing of various blends to determine optimal weight ratios for improved solubility and dissolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high melting point nucleators are used to achieve desired optical clarity and mechanical properties, then nucleation efficiency and material properties are improved, but processing temperature must be increased leading to higher energy consumption and longer cycle times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical clarity and mechanical propertiesVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical-chemical parameters of the nucleating system by using blends of nucleators with different melting points and solubility characteristics. This allows the system to achieve effective nucleation at lower processing temperatures while maintaining the desired optical clarity and mechanical properties, thereby reducing energy consumption without sacrificing material performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite nucleating systems consisting of multiple nucleators blended together. These composite systems combine the advantages of individual nucleators with different thermal properties, enabling effective nucleation at reduced temperatures while maintaining nucleation efficiency and material properties, thus resolving the contradiction between high temperature requirements and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If high processing temperatures are used to dissolve high melting point nucleators, then adequate dissolution and nucleation are achieved, but cycle time increases due to longer cooling periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenucleation effectivenessVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the thermal parameters of the nucleating system by selecting nucleators and blends with lower melting points and improved solubility. This enables adequate dissolution and effective nucleation to occur at lower processing temperatures, which reduces the cooling time required and thereby shortens the overall cycle time while maintaining nucleation effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality optimization by selecting specific nucleators with tailored solubility and melting point characteristics suited for the particular polyolefin resin being processed. This localized optimization of nucleator properties allows for effective nucleation at lower temperatures specific to each resin type, reducing cycle time without compromising nucleation effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If high processing temperatures are used to accommodate high melting point nucleators, then dissolution is improved, but nucleator sublimation occurs leading to plate-out on moulding equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedissolution completenessVSAvoidnucleator sublimation and plate-out
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the thermal stability parameters of the nucleating system by selecting nucleators with lower melting points and higher thermal stability. This allows complete dissolution to be achieved at lower processing temperatures that are below the sublimation point of the nucleators, thereby preventing nucleator sublimation and plate-out on moulding equipment while maintaining dissolution completeness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of high temperature processing into a benefit by selecting nucleators whose melting points are optimized for the processing temperature range. This ensures that the nucleators dissolve completely at the processing temperature without reaching their sublimation point, transforming the temperature constraint into an advantage that prevents plate-out while achieving adequate dissolution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Use of energy by moving object

If processing temperature is reduced to lower energy consumption, then energy efficiency is improved, but dissolution of high melting point nucleators becomes insufficient leading to increased haze

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidoptical clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the solubility parameters of the nucleating system by selecting nucleators and blends with improved solubility characteristics and lower melting points. This enables complete dissolution of the nucleators at reduced processing temperatures, maintaining optical clarity and preventing haze formation while achieving lower energy consumption through reduced processing temperatures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite nucleating systems where multiple nucleators with different solubility and melting point characteristics are blended together. This composite approach ensures that at least one nucleator in the blend remains effectively dissolved at lower processing temperatures, maintaining optical clarity and preventing haze while enabling energy-efficient processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method enables the production of nucleated polyolefin materials with reduced haze and improved optical properties at lower processing temperatures, broadening the temperature range for material preparation while maintaining desirable mechanical and optical properties.

Implementation Method 1

preparation of a nucleated polyolefin material typically requires that the nucleator be dissolved in the molten resin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDissolution: Solvation

Implementation Method 2

Subsequent recrystallization of the soluble nucleator forms a fine crystalline network providing nucleation sites

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRecrystallization: Crystallisation

Implementation Method 3

which reduce the size of spherulites formed in the resin as it cools, thereby reducing light scattering and improving clarity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 4

nucleators can sublimate when heated to temperatures near their melting points, for instance during the high temperature moulding operation, leading to unwanted re-deposition on moulding equipment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSublimation: Sublimation

Data Source

PatentUS11733189B2Method for identifying a blend of nucleators useful for preparing a nucleated polyolefin material
Publication Date: 2023.08.22 NJC EURO
  • US11733189B2 patent drawing
  • US11733189B2 patent drawing
  • US11733189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for identifying a blend of nucleators with reduced haze in nucleated polyolefin material compared to blends of the same nucleators having different component weight ratios. The method comprises:i) preparing multiple blends of at least two nucleators wherein each blend containing the same nucleators in different weight ratios, wherein the blends include one or more blends in which one of the nucleators is a major weight fraction and one or more blends where the same nucleator is a minor weight fraction;ii) determining, for each blend, a minimum dissolution temperature when the blend completely dissolves in individual samples of the same molten polyolefin resin, wherein the concentration of each blend is substantially the same and below the saturation point in the molten polyolefin resin; andiii) identifying a blend that has a lower minimum dissolution temperature than the majority of the blends.