Numerically Controlled Clamping Members for Machining Centers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machining centers face high setup times and costs due to the need for frequent adjustments of workpiece clamping members, especially when machining diverse workpieces, leading to increased downtime and machining costs, and existing systems are prone to inaccuracies and mechanical stresses from resistance during positioning.

Innovation Solution

A numerically controlled machining center with adjustable clamping members along multiple axes, utilizing a temporary constraining element and stop devices to simplify and automate the adjustment process, eliminating the need for additional position sensors and allowing for precise positioning of workpieces of complex shapes without additional axes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If frequent adjustments of clamping members are performed to machine diverse workpieces, then adaptability is improved, but setup time and machine downtime increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to diverse workpiece shapesVSAvoidsetup time and machine downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping members are made dynamically adjustable along two orthogonal directions (first and second directions) parallel to numerically controlled axes. This dynamic positioning capability allows the machine to adapt to diverse workpiece shapes without manual reconfiguration, reducing setup time while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with a numerically controlled system. The control unit automatically positions clamping members along the first and second directions based on programmed coordinates, eliminating the need for skilled workers to manually adjust each clamping member and significantly reducing setup time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Extent of automation

If numerically controlled systems with position transducers are used to position clamping members, then automation is improved, but machine costs increase due to complex components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of set-up phaseVSAvoidmachine costs and complex components
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The numerically controlled axes already present in the machining center are made multi-functional by using them for both machining operations and for positioning clamping members. This eliminates the need for separate positioning systems with additional position transducers, achieving automation while controlling costs by reusing existing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The existing numerically controlled axes serve dual purposes: they perform both the machining function and the clamping member positioning function. The system uses its own existing motion capabilities to automate the setup process without requiring external positioning systems, thereby reducing overall system complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If tool head performs translational movement to position clamping members, then positioning capability is improved, but mechanical stresses and machining precision risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning capabilityVSAvoidmechanical stresses and precision risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The positioning function is segmented from the tool head and assigned to dedicated clamping members that move independently along guides on the workpiece support. This segmentation allows the tool head to focus solely on machining operations while clamping members handle positioning, reducing mechanical stresses on the tool head and improving overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces guides as intermediary elements between the workpiece support and the clamping members. These guides provide a dedicated, low-friction path for clamping member movement, reducing mechanical stresses and improving positioning reliability without requiring the tool head to perform positioning functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If additional position sensors are installed to detect clamping member positions, then positioning accuracy is improved, but device complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition detection accuracyVSAvoidnumber of sensors and system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The numerically controlled system provides inherent feedback through its existing control unit, which tracks the position of clamping members along the first and second directions. This feedback mechanism uses the same control infrastructure already present for machining operations, achieving accurate position detection without adding separate position sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2035199B1Machine tool or machining centre with numerically controlled double adjustment of the clamping members
Publication Date: 2010.06.02 PAOLINO BACCI SRL
  • EP2035199B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2035199B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2035199B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The machining centre comprises: a tool head (9); at least one support (15) for workpieces to be machined; and a control unit. The head and the support are movable with respect to each other along a plurality of numerically controlled axes of translation. Moreover, the support is provided with a plurality of clamping members (19) adjustable in variable positions with respect to the support along at least a first direction of adjustment and a second direction of adjustment, substantially parallel respectively to a first (X) of said numerically controlled axes of translation and a second (Y) of said numerically controlled axes of translation. Along the second direction of adjustment the distance of the clamping members with respect to the relative support (15) is adjusted.