Nutrient Density Rating and Fullness Factor Food Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing food rating systems are ineffective for evaluating the suitability of foods for multiple nutritional goals such as health improvement, hunger control, and weight management, as they often focus on single nutrients or calorie content, ignoring the impact of dozens of essential nutrients and not accounting for satiating effects.

Innovation Solution

A method that calculates a food's Nutrient Density Rating (NDR) and Fullness Factor (FF) to rank foods based on their nutritional content and satiating effect, allowing for visual representation on a Nutritional Target Map (NTM) to guide food selection for various dietary objectives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If food rating systems focus on single nutrients or calorie content, then the evaluation is simplified, but the effectiveness in evaluating food suitability for multiple nutritional goals deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of food evaluationVSAvoideffectiveness in evaluating food suitability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple nutrient evaluations into a single comprehensive rating system. It combines calorie content, nutrient density, and satiating effect into one integrated food rating that simultaneously addresses multiple nutritional goals including weight loss, health improvement, and hunger control, resolving the contradiction between simple evaluation and comprehensive effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The food rating system is designed with multi-functionality to serve multiple nutritional objectives simultaneously. The rating incorporates various factors (calories, nutrient density, satiating effect) that make it universally applicable for different dietary goals such as weight loss, weight gain, and general health improvement, eliminating the need for separate evaluation systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If food rating systems focus only on weight loss, then the system is simplified, but its effectiveness for other goals such as weight gain or maximizing health deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoideffectiveness for multiple dietary goals
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal food rating system that can adapt to multiple dietary goals through a single comprehensive framework. The rating incorporates weight loss considerations (calorie density), weight gain considerations (nutrient density), and health optimization (satiating effect), allowing the same system to serve diverse nutritional objectives without requiring separate specialized systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes in the rating calculation to adapt to different dietary goals. By adjusting the weighting of different factors (calories, nutrient density, satiating effect) within the same rating framework, the system can optimize for weight loss, weight gain, or general health goals without changing the fundamental structure of the evaluation system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If food lists are finite in nature, then the system is manageable, but the range of possible food selections being nearly unlimited makes it difficult to evaluate suitability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanageability of food evaluationVSAvoidnumber of food options
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service evaluation system where individuals can independently rate any food item using the comprehensive rating formula. The system empowers users to evaluate their own food choices without requiring pre-prepared lists or expert intervention, making the evaluation process manageable despite the unlimited number of possible food options

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The rating system transforms the evaluation of numerous food options into a standardized parameter-based calculation. By converting diverse food characteristics into measurable parameters (calories, nutrient density, satiating effect) that can be systematically compared, the system makes managing and evaluating a large quantity of food options become organized and manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7620531B1Method for determining and representing food products based on nutrient density rating and predicted satiating effect
Publication Date: 2009.11.17 ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS
  • US7620531B1 patent drawing
  • US7620531B1 patent drawing
  • US7620531B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of assisting individuals in making food choices by providing two nutritional indices. One is a numerical expression of a food's overall nutrient density and the other is a separate numerical expression that relates to a food's caloric density that is a prediction of the satiating effect of a food. A visual aid in the form of a graph or chart is provided so individuals using the indices can refer to the chart to determine food selections in accordance with the individual's dietary goals.