Non-Volatile Memory Controller Data Rearrangement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current non-volatile memory control technologies face inefficiencies in data rearrangement and garbage collection due to the complex management of logical-to-physical mapping tables, leading to resource-intensive operations and reduced performance in flash memory storage devices.

Innovation Solution

A controller is implemented to dynamically select and rearrange data from blocks with excessive logical group amounts, transferring data to a destination block while updating sub-tables, thereby reducing the logical group count and optimizing storage efficiency through background data rearrangement and dynamic threshold adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If data rearrangement is performed to reduce logical group amount in source blocks, then garbage collection efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional controller operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegarbage collection efficiencyVSAvoidcontroller operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller performs data rearrangement operations in advance during background tasks, identifying source blocks with excessive logical group amounts and proactively redistributing data before garbage collection is needed. This preliminary action reduces the workload during actual garbage collection operations, improving overall efficiency without requiring complex real-time decision-making during critical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service mechanisms where the controller automatically monitors logical group amounts in each block and autonomously initiates data rearrangement when thresholds are exceeded. This self-monitoring and self-correction capability reduces the need for external intervention and simplifies the overall control architecture by making the system self-regulating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Stability of the object's composition

If logical group amount threshold is set low, then data distribution uniformity is improved, but write performance deteriorates due to frequent rearrangement operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata distribution uniformityVSAvoidwrite performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller dynamically adjusts the logical group amount threshold based on system conditions, workload characteristics, and block usage patterns. Rather than using a fixed low threshold that would trigger frequent rearrangements, the threshold is adaptively modified to balance data distribution uniformity with write performance, allowing higher thresholds during heavy write periods and lower thresholds when the system is idle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The data rearrangement system transitions from a static threshold-based approach to a dynamic adaptive mechanism. The controller continuously evaluates block states and adjusts rearrangement triggers in real-time, making the system responsive to changing conditions. This dynamic behavior allows the system to maintain good data distribution while avoiding excessive rearrangement operations that would degrade write performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If data is collected from multiple blocks to destination block, then data rearrangement effectiveness is improved, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata rearrangement effectivenessVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The controller merges multiple data collection operations into consolidated batches, combining data from multiple source blocks into single destination block operations when possible. This merging reduces the total number of separate read-modify-write cycles required, thereby improving rearrangement effectiveness while minimizing the cumulative resource consumption associated with individual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous background data rearrangement operations that continuously collect and redistribute data across blocks. Rather than performing discrete, interruptive rearrangement operations, the continuous action ensures data is gradually balanced across the storage medium, improving overall effectiveness while distributing resource consumption evenly over time rather than concentrating it in intensive bursts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11269534B2Data storage device and non-volatile memory control method
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 SILICON MOTION INC
  • US11269534B2 patent drawing
  • US11269534B2 patent drawing
  • US11269534B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An efficient control technology for non-volatile memory is shown. A controller selects the main source block from the non-volatile memory, wherein the main source block has a logical group amount exceeding a threshold amount. The controller selects a target logical group from the main source block, and collects data of the target logical group to a destination block provided by the non-volatile memory to reduce the logical group amount of the main source block.