Speculative Command Execution in NVMe Controller Memory Buffer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The NVMe standard for non-volatile storage media faces inefficiencies in command processing due to the sequential nature of submission and completion queues, leading to increased latency and performance bottlenecks, particularly in low queue depths.

Innovation Solution

Implementing speculative execution of commands within the memory device, where the memory device can begin processing commands before formal notification from the host device, by monitoring queue updates and utilizing internal resources to pre-fetch data or perform operations like error correction and encryption, thereby reducing latency and improving performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If sequential command processing through submission and completion queues is used, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but command execution latency increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand execution latencyVSAvoidcommand processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements speculative execution where the memory device proactively processes commands before formal notification from the host device. The controller monitors queue updates and begins command execution speculatively, performing data prefetching, error correction, and encryption operations in advance. This preliminary action reduces command execution latency and improves throughput by eliminating waiting time in the sequential processing model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If speculative execution of commands is implemented, then command execution latency is reduced and productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand processing throughputVSAvoidcontroller processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The memory device controller performs self-service by autonomously monitoring submission queue updates and initiating speculative command execution without requiring explicit host device instructions. The controller uses its own internal resources to prefetch data, perform error correction, and execute encryption/decryption operations. This self-service capability enables speculative execution while managing complexity through autonomous decision-making based on queue state monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Speed

If speculative execution with pre-fetching is performed, then command execution speed is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand execution speedVSAvoidcontroller energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively prefetching only the portion of data needed for imminent command execution rather than pre-fetching entire data sets. The controller monitors submission queue depth and host device activity patterns to determine the optimal amount of speculative pre-fetching. This partial approach balances speed improvement against energy consumption by performing only necessary preliminary operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10725835B2System and method for speculative execution of commands using a controller memory buffer
Publication Date: 2020.07.28 SANDISK TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US10725835B2 patent drawing
  • US10725835B2 patent drawing
  • US10725835B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for speculative execution of commands using a controller memory buffer are disclosed. Non-Volatile Memory Express (NVMe) implements a paired submission queue and completion queue mechanism, with host software on a host device placing commands into the submission queue and thereafter notifying a memory device of the commands placed in the submission queue. The submission queue may be resident in the memory device, such as in the controller buffer memory. Prior to notice by the host device, the memory device may determine that the commands have been placed in the submission queue and may speculatively execute the commands. Determining whether to begin processing a command prior to the host device notifying the memory device that the command is posted to the submission queue may be based on a type of command, such as a read or write command. The host device may override a command, such as a flush command, posted to the submission queue, and processing of the command canceled.