Oat Flour Enzyme Processing for Yield and Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for producing oat-based beverages and food products result in high waste and low yields, and the resulting compositions lack stability during storage due to inefficient breakdown of carbohydrates and fibers in whole oat flour.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the hydration of oat flour with water, followed by the addition of enzymes at specific temperatures to form enzyme oat-water mixtures, which undergo gelatinization, hydrolysis, and decantation to produce a stable oat composition with reduced viscosity and improved shelf stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional methods are used to breakdown carbohydrates and fibers in oat flour, then processing is simpler, but waste increases and yield decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidwaste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the carbohydrate breakdown process into multiple sequential enzymatic stages, each targeting specific carbohydrate structures. First, alpha-amylase breaks down starch into dextrins and maltose. Then, glucoamylase converts these into glucose. Finally, cellulase breaks down cellulose fibers. This segmentation allows complete carbohydrate utilization while maintaining processing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically changes temperature parameters across different enzymatic stages to optimize breakdown efficiency. The process uses 60-70°C for alpha-amylase, 40-50°C for glucoamylase, and 50-60°C for cellulase. These parameter changes enable complete carbohydrate and fiber breakdown while minimizing waste and maximizing yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional methods are used to breakdown carbohydrates and fibers in oat flour, then processing is simpler, but yield decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the carbohydrate breakdown process into multiple sequential enzymatic stages, each targeting specific carbohydrate structures. First, alpha-amylase breaks down starch into dextrins and maltose. Then, glucoamylase converts these into glucose. Finally, cellulase breaks down cellulose fibers. This segmentation allows complete carbohydrate utilization while maintaining processing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically changes temperature parameters across different enzymatic stages to optimize breakdown efficiency. The process uses 60-70°C for alpha-amylase, 40-50°C for glucoamylase, and 50-60°C for cellulase. These parameter changes enable complete carbohydrate and fiber breakdown while minimizing waste and maximizing yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional methods are used for oat-based food compositions, then manufacturing is easier, but shelf stability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing easeVSAvoidshelf stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous enzymatic treatment throughout the processing period, maintaining optimal temperatures and enzyme concentrations to ensure complete carbohydrate and fiber breakdown. This continuous action prevents residual carbohydrates from causing instability during storage, thereby improving shelf stability while keeping manufacturing straightforward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically changes temperature parameters across different enzymatic stages to optimize breakdown efficiency. The process uses 60-70°C for alpha-amylase, 40-50°C for glucoamylase, and 50-60°C for cellulase. These parameter changes enable complete carbohydrate and fiber breakdown while minimizing waste and maximizing yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If enzymes are added at higher temperatures, then breakdown efficiency increases, but enzyme activity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreakdown efficiencyVSAvoidenzyme activity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically changes temperature parameters across different enzymatic stages to optimize breakdown efficiency. The process uses 60-70°C for alpha-amylase, 40-50°C for glucoamylase, and 50-60°C for cellulase. These parameter changes enable complete carbohydrate and fiber breakdown while minimizing waste and maximizing yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the carbohydrate breakdown process into multiple sequential enzymatic stages, each targeting specific carbohydrate structures. First, alpha-amylase breaks down starch into dextrins and maltose. Then, glucoamylase converts these into glucose. Finally, cellulase breaks down cellulose fibers. This segmentation allows complete carbohydrate utilization while maintaining processing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces waste, improves yields, and enhances the shelf stability of oat-based products by effectively breaking down carbohydrates and fibers, resulting in a more stable and aromatic final product.

Implementation Method 1

adding a first enzyme to the oat-water mixture at a temperature between 10° C. and 30° C., inclusively, to form a first enzyme oat-water mixture. The method further includes increasing the temperature of the first enzyme oat-water mixture to between 75° C. and 95° C., inclusively.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 2

adding a first enzyme to the oat-water mixture at a temperature between 10° C. and 30° C., inclusively, to form a first enzyme oat-water mixture. The method further includes adding an additional amount of the first enzyme to the first enzyme oat-water mixture after increasing the temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme catalysis: Enzyme

Implementation Method 3

The method further includes increasing the temperature of the first enzyme oat-water mixture to between 75° C. and 95° C., inclusively. The method further includes maintaining, in a processing step, a temperature of the second enzyme oat-water mixture between 75° C. and 95° C., inclusively.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGelatinization:

Implementation Method 4

The method further includes removing an amount of solids from the third enzyme oat-water mixture to form the oat composition.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSedimentation: Sedimentation

Data Source

PatentUS12035723B1Oat flour based food composition and method of manufacture
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 CHOBANI LLC
  • US12035723B1 patent drawing
  • US12035723B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of making an oat composition is provided. The method includes adding oat flour to water. The method further includes adding a first enzyme to the oat-water mixture. The method further includes increasing the temperature of the oat-water mixture with the first enzyme, and maintaining the increased temperature of the oat-water mixture with the first enzyme. The method further includes cooling the oat-water mixture with the first enzyme. The method further includes adding an enzyme blend to the oat-water mixture with the first enzyme. The method further includes removing an amount of solids from the third enzyme oat-water mixture to form the oat composition. The method is able to achieve higher yields, increased shelf stability, and lower waste from manufacturing compared to conventional oat-based food composition manufacturing methods.