Vehicle Electrical Module Interchangeability via OBD2 Part Cross-Reference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Determining the interchangeability of vehicle components across different makes and models is challenging due to varying part numbering schemes and lack of clear identification of component categories, leading to difficulties in replacing specialized electronic modules.

Innovation Solution

A system and process utilizing an OBD2 scanner, electronic parts catalog, and interchangeability determination server to identify and determine the compatibility of vehicle components by cross-referencing part numbers and physical attributes, enabling easier replacement of components across different vehicle manufacturers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If component interchangeability is determined manually through part number comparison, then identification accuracy may be improved, but time consumption and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical comparison methods with an automated electronic system that uses OBD2 scanners to digitally retrieve and compare component data, eliminating manual labor while maintaining identification accuracy through systematic electronic verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated determination system as an intermediary between component identification and interchangeability verification, using electronic databases and algorithms to mediate the comparison process, thereby reducing time consumption while preserving accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If specialized electronic modules are used in vehicles, then vehicle performance and functionality are improved, but part availability and ease of repair deteriorate due to lack of standardization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle performanceVSAvoidpart availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal determination system that can identify interchangeability across different vehicle makes and models, enabling specialized components to be replaced with compatible alternatives from various sources, thereby improving part availability without compromising vehicle performance requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from fixed manufacturer-specific part numbers to a flexible parameter-based comparison system that evaluates multiple attributes (electrical characteristics, physical dimensions, functional specifications) to determine interchangeability, enabling broader part availability while maintaining performance standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If different manufacturers employ different part numbering schemes, then manufacturer-specific identification precision is improved, but cross-manufacturer component interchangeability determination becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart number identification precisionVSAvoidcross-manufacturer interchangeability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a universal determination system that handles multiple manufacturer-specific numbering schemes simultaneously, enabling the system to adapt to different identification systems while maintaining the ability to cross-reference and determine interchangeability across manufacturers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a standardized electronic database and comparison algorithm as an intermediary layer between different manufacturer numbering schemes, translating and comparing component attributes across different identification systems to determine interchangeability without losing precision in any individual system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of manufacture

If component categories are not clearly identified on modules, then manufacturing flexibility and cost-effectiveness are improved, but diagnostic speed and repair efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoiddiagnostic speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces visual inspection methods with automated electronic identification using OBD2 scanners that retrieve component category information digitally, eliminating the need for physical labels while improving diagnostic speed through automated data retrieval and analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20260050257A1System and method to identify interchangeable electrical components
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 JOSEPH MICHAEL SIEGER TRUST
  • US20260050257A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050257A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050257A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Briefly, one or more embodiments are direct to a process, system, and article for determining interchangeability of one or more electrical components of a particular motor vehicle. Performance of a diagnostic scan may be initiated of the particular motor vehicle. Results of the diagnostic scan may be received. One or more service part numbers/identifiers for electrical components interrogated during the diagnostic scan may be identified. One or more electronic parts catalogs indicating vehicle manufacturer part numbers/identifiers for electrical components of a set of motor vehicles may be accessed. One or more cross-references between the service part numbers/identifiers for electrical components interrogated during the diagnostic scan and the vehicle manufacturer part numbers/identifiers may be determined. The cross-references may be stored in one or more records of a database.