Object Classification Disambiguation via Expectation Counts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicles face challenges in accurately classifying traffic objects, leading to ambiguous data and potential misoperation due to incorrect object classification by onboard sensors, which affects navigation and map updates.

Innovation Solution

A method that disambiguates object classifications by considering the expectation count of nearby objects of the same type within a predefined distance, using information from multiple vehicles to determine an accurate classification and update mapping models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If object classification is performed using onboard sensors in autonomous vehicles, then navigation capability is enabled, but classification accuracy deteriorates leading to ambiguous data and potential misoperation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation reliabilityVSAvoidobject classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines object classification data from multiple vehicles (crowdsourcing) to resolve ambiguous classifications. When one vehicle's sensor data is uncertain, the system aggregates classifications from other vehicles observing the same object, merging multiple data sources to achieve higher classification accuracy and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using expectation counts (how many objects of a certain type are expected at a location) to validate and correct individual vehicle classifications. If the aggregated classification contradicts the expectation count, the system adjusts the classification to align with the expected pattern, ensuring consistent and reliable navigation data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If multiple object classifications are collected from multiple vehicles, then data completeness is improved, but data ambiguity increases making it difficult to determine the correct classification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidclassification clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces expectation count as an additional parameter to evaluate object classifications. Instead of relying solely on raw classification counts, the system compares actual classifications against expected classifications based on location and object type patterns, using this parameter to resolve ambiguities and determine the most accurate classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The expectation count acts as an intermediary that mediates between multiple vehicle classifications and the final determined classification. When classifications from multiple vehicles conflict, the expectation count serves as a reference standard to resolve the conflict and establish the correct classification, preventing information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If expectation count is used to disambiguate object classifications, then classification accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by using expectation counts selectively - only when classification ambiguity is detected. Rather than computing expectation counts for every single object classification, the system activates this more complex computation only when needed to resolve ambiguities, balancing accuracy improvement with computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11557130B2Method and apparatus for determining the classification of an object
Publication Date: 2023.01.17 HERE GLOBAL BV
  • US11557130B2 patent drawing
  • US11557130B2 patent drawing
  • US11557130B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods described herein relate to disambiguating objects for a particular location. Methods may include receiving, from a vehicle, an indication of an object associated with an object classification for the object in view of the vehicle. The object classification is further associated with an object type. The method further includes receiving, from the vehicle, information pertaining to one or more other objects of the same object type within a predefined distance of the object; determining an expectation count for the object type based at least in part on a count of the object and the one or more objects of the same object type for the particular location; and disambiguating one or more object classifications from a plurality of object classifications based at least in part on the expectation count. A corresponding apparatus and computer program product are also provided.