Object Counting via Learned Estimation Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques struggle to accurately count objects, especially when they are partly or completely hidden, such as crops obscured by leaves.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that includes a feature acquisition unit to detect target objects from images, a selection unit to choose estimation parameters based on image capturing targets, and an estimation unit to estimate the number of target objects using the selected parameters and features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If image processing techniques are used to detect objects, then detection accuracy is improved for visible objects, but detection fails completely when objects are hidden

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection reliability for hidden objects
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an estimation mechanism that acts as an intermediary between detection results and final object count. When detection fails or returns unreliable results (especially for hidden objects), the estimation unit uses learned parameters and features to infer the actual number of objects, bridging the gap between what can be detected and what actually exists

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from direct detection to parameter-based estimation. By learning parameters that correlate with object presence (such as leaf density, image features, environmental conditions) and using these parameters to estimate object counts, the system can infer hidden objects without directly detecting them

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If detection processing is applied to all regions, then complete object information is obtained, but processing time and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject count accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies detection processing selectively rather than uniformly to all regions. By using estimation parameters and features to identify regions where detection is likely to succeed, the system focuses computational resources on promising areas while using estimation for regions where objects are likely hidden, achieving reasonable accuracy with reduced processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary estimation using learned parameters before committing to full detection processing. This preliminary action identifies regions where detection is worthwhile and regions where estimation should be used, avoiding unnecessary computational expenditure on regions where objects are clearly hidden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12307343B2Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 CANON KK
  • US12307343B2 patent drawing
  • US12307343B2 patent drawing
  • US12307343B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An estimation parameter for estimating the actual number of target objects in a designated region of a field is learned using a feature amount acquired from a captured image of a set region of the field and the actual number of target objects in the set region as learning data.