Object Detection Data Augmentation via Reinforcement Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing object detection models face challenges in data augmentation due to the high cost and inefficiency of manually labeling bounding shapes, limiting their performance and requiring extensive computational resources.

Innovation Solution

A computing system employing reinforcement learning to iteratively select augmentation operations, generating augmented training images that improve object detection model performance by leveraging a defined search space of operations, including those that modify or preserve bounding shapes, and updating the controller model based on performance metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual labeling of bounding shapes is used to collect training data, then object detection model performance can be improved, but the cost and time required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection model performanceVSAvoidtime required for manual labeling
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data augmentation on existing labeled images before training the object detection model. By pre-processing the training data with various augmentation operations (rotation, scaling, cropping, color adjustments), the system creates additional diverse training examples without requiring manual labeling, thus improving model performance while saving time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of existing labeled training images and applies augmentation operations to generate variant versions. These copied and transformed images serve as additional training data, eliminating the need to manually label new images while providing sufficient training diversity for improved model performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If more training data is collected to improve object detection performance, then model accuracy increases, but the cost of data collection and labeling increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidamount of training data
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies data augmentation operations as a preliminary step before model training, transforming existing training images into multiple augmented versions. This preliminary processing effectively increases the quantity of training data available without requiring proportional increases in manual labeling resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system generates multiple copies of each training image through augmentation operations, creating a expanded training dataset from a smaller original set. This copying approach maintains data diversity while reducing the need to collect and label large volumes of additional images

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If extensive manual labeling is performed to obtain sufficient training data, then object detection performance improves, but computational resources and time are excessively consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection performanceVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs data augmentation as a preliminary computational step that is more efficient than manual labeling. By automating the data preparation process through programmable augmentation operations, the system improves computational efficiency while still providing sufficient training data for high model performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual labeling with automated computational augmentation operations. This substitution eliminates human labor while using efficient algorithms to generate training data, significantly improving productivity and reducing the computational burden associated with extensive manual data collection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20260030873A1Learning Data Augmentation Strategies for Object Detection
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20260030873A1 patent drawing
  • US20260030873A1 patent drawing
  • US20260030873A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Example aspects of the present disclosure are directed to systems and methods for learning data augmentation strategies for improved object detection model performance. In particular, example aspects of the present disclosure are directed to iterative reinforcement learning approaches in which, at each of a plurality of iterations, a controller model selects a series of one or more augmentation operations to be applied to training images to generate augmented images. For example, the controller model can select the augmentation operations from a defined search space of available operations which can, for example, include operations that augment the training image without modification of the locations of a target object and corresponding bounding shape within the image and/or operations that do modify the locations of the target object and bounding shape within the training image.