Object Detection Apparatus Using Collision Time and Region Overlap

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle collision avoidance systems using millimeter-wave radar and monocular cameras may mistakenly recognize different objects as the same due to proximity, leading to inaccurate object detection.

Innovation Solution

An object detection apparatus that defines regions based on radar and camera data, calculating collision times and determining object sameness based on region overlap and time difference within a reference value, ensuring accurate identification of objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If objects detected by radar and camera are determined to be the same based solely on spatial proximity (region overlap), then the determination process is simple, but false positives increase when different objects are in close proximity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject sameness determination accuracyVSAvoiddetermination process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a new parameter (collision time) in addition to the existing spatial parameter (region overlap) to determine object sameness. By changing from a single-parameter to multi-parameter determination approach, the system achieves more accurate object identification while reducing false positives, directly resolving the technical contradiction between determination accuracy and process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses collision time as an intermediary parameter to bridge radar detection data and camera detection data. This intermediary enables more reliable object matching by providing an additional verification dimension beyond spatial proximity alone, allowing the system to distinguish between truly identical objects and different objects that happen to be in close proximity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If only spatial region overlap is used to determine object sameness, then the determination is computationally efficient, but accuracy decreases due to false positives from nearby different objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection reliabilityVSAvoidcomputation time for object determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds collision time as an additional determination parameter alongside spatial region overlap. This parameter enhancement improves detection reliability by providing a second verification criterion that filters out false positives, while the computational overhead remains manageable through efficient calculation methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10049577B2Object detection apparatus
Publication Date: 2018.08.14 DENSO CORP
  • US10049577B2 patent drawing
  • US10049577B2 patent drawing
  • US10049577B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an object detection apparatus, a proximity determination unit determines whether or not a first object and a second object are in close proximity to each other, where the first object is an object detected based on detection information acquired from a radar and the second object is an object detected based on a captured image acquired from a monocular camera. A sameness determination unit determines that the first object and the second object are the same object, if it is determined that the first object and the second object are in close proximity to each other and if a difference between a first collision time with the first object and a second collision time with the second object is less than a reference value.