Object Detection Coverage Estimation Using 3D Spatial Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional computer vision systems face challenges in providing accurate real-world spatial coverage information due to system constraints and trade-offs, leading to incomplete object detection and decision-making difficulties.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for object detection coverage estimation that determines spatial coverage of detected objects using metadata and a pinhole camera model to calculate three-dimensional coordinates from two-dimensional image data, identifying both coverage areas and blind spots.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If conventional methods reduce computing power requirements by lowering frame rate, reducing image resolution, or limiting detection parameters, then computing power requirements are reduced, but the effective processing coverage and detection accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing power requirementsVSAvoiddetection accuracy and processing coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a new dimension of spatial coverage estimation by calculating three-dimensional coverage areas from two-dimensional detection data. This allows the system to maintain full-resolution processing while providing additional spatial context that helps optimize detection parameters without sacrificing accuracy. The coverage estimation operates in a third spatial dimension, enabling better decision-making about where to apply detection resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using estimated spatial coverage information to inform subsequent detection decisions. The coverage estimation provides feedback about which areas are already well-covered versus which areas need more detection attention, allowing the system to dynamically adjust detection parameters and resource allocation to maintain accuracy while reducing overall computing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system reconfigures software within system constraints to fulfill requirements, then system requirements are met, but the effective processing coverage is reduced and the system can no longer cover the full area of the camera's view

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem requirement fulfillmentVSAvoidprocessing coverage area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a coverage estimation dimension that operates independently of the detection configuration constraints. By estimating three-dimensional spatial coverage from two-dimensional detection results, the system can evaluate the actual coverage achieved regardless of software reconfiguration, allowing requirements to be met without permanently losing coverage area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The coverage estimation acts as an intermediary between system constraints and actual detection performance. It provides objective measurement of coverage that mediates between the conflicting requirements of adapting to system constraints and maintaining full processing coverage, enabling informed decisions about configuration trade-offs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If conventional object detection systems process images at full resolution with high frame rates, then detection accuracy is improved, but computing power requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcomputing power requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces spatial coverage estimation as an additional dimension that works alongside traditional detection. This coverage information enables smarter resource allocation by identifying which high-resolution processing is actually necessary versus which areas could use lower-resolution processing, thereby reducing overall computing power while maintaining accuracy where it matters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses coverage estimation to dynamically change processing parameters based on actual spatial coverage needs. Areas with sufficient coverage can use lower computing power settings, while areas needing better detection maintain high-resolution processing, optimizing the balance between accuracy and power consumption across the entire field of view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12387495B2Method, system and computer readable media for object detection coverage estimation
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 NEC CORP
  • US12387495B2 patent drawing
  • US12387495B2 patent drawing
  • US12387495B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems and computer readable medium for object detection coverage estimation are provided. The system for object detection coverage estimation includes a camera and a processing means. The processing means is coupled to the camera to receive image data acquired by the camera, the image data including a detected object. The processing means is configured to determine a spatial coverage of the detected object based on detected object metadata associated with the detected object in the image data received from the camera.