Object Detection Model Training With Automated Defect Marking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

General users face challenges in using Low Code/No Code AI platforms for object detection model training due to insufficient training image quantity and quality, inconsistent marking, and the need for iterative data analysis, especially in factory environments, leading to inaccurate defect recognition.

Innovation Solution

A training system and method that includes a processing unit to iteratively train an object detection model, correct misjudgment sets, and adjust epoch numbers based on misjudgment values, ensuring the model avoids underfitting and overfitting, and outputs a master model for optimal performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the quantity of training images is increased to improve model accuracy, then the model performance is improved, but the time-consuming marking process and data collection difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidmarking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically generates training images by synthesizing defect information from unlabeled images, allowing the system to serve itself by creating training data without requiring manual marking for each image. The processing unit automatically identifies defect regions and generates corresponding training images with proper markings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates synthetic training images by copying and transforming defect information from source images. The processing unit extracts defect characteristics and generates new training images that replicate these patterns, providing sufficient training data without requiring original defect images for each training sample.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If manual marking of training images is performed to ensure data quality, then the marking precision is improved, but the marking consistency and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking precisionVSAvoidmarking efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic marking by having the processing unit identify defect regions and generate training images with proper annotations. This eliminates the need for manual marking while maintaining consistent and accurate labeling through algorithmic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual marking process with an automated information processing system. The processing unit uses image processing algorithms to automatically identify defects and generate markings, substituting human labor with computational processes that are both efficient and consistent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If iterative data analysis and model optimization are performed to improve defect recognition capability, then the model accuracy is improved, but the complexity of the training process and required data analysis ability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect recognition accuracyVSAvoidtraining process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex training process into distinct functional modules: image collection, defect identification, training image generation, model training, and validation. Each module is handled by specific processing units, making the overall complex process more manageable and systematic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the processing unit analyzes model performance on validation sets and adjusts training parameters accordingly. The processing unit identifies misjudgment regions and uses this feedback to generate corrected training images, continuously optimizing model accuracy through automated feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12530880B2Training system and method, testing system and method, data filtering system and method, and computer readable recording medium with stored program
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 WISTRON CORP
  • US12530880B2 patent drawing
  • US12530880B2 patent drawing
  • US12530880B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a training system and method, a testing system and method, a data filtering system and method, and a computer readable recording medium with stored program that includes verifying whether an object detection model has completed a training set learning and determining whether the object detection model is overfitting with a validation set, and outputting the training model as a master model before the object detection model is overfitting, and how to iterate the master model to match the test set test results and continuously maintain an online test level. The present invention provides a standardized method for achieving data marking consistency and training data selection.