Object Detection Apparatus False Negative Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional object detection systems fail to adequately reduce false negatives, where objects intended to be detected are missed, due to the limited performance of the first detector used in the detection process.

Innovation Solution

An object detection apparatus comprising an acquisition unit, a first detector, a false negative determining unit, and a second detector, where the false negative determining unit compares detection results across frames to identify missed detections, and the second detector, differing in performance, is applied to the peripheral area of the first detector's results to enhance detection accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single detector is used for object detection, then the detection process is simple and fast, but false negatives occur frequently due to limited detection performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple detectors (first detector and second detector) with different performance characteristics. Each detector handles specific detection tasks, and their results are combined to achieve more reliable detection while maintaining system manageability through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different detectors are configured with different detection parameters and performance characteristics. The first detector uses one set of parameters optimized for certain conditions, while the second detector uses different parameters optimized for other conditions, allowing the system to adapt to various detection scenarios and reduce false negatives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If two detectors are used to reduce false positives, then detection reliability improves, but the number of false negatives increases due to the first detector's limited performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive reductionVSAvoidfalse negative reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the determination unit analyzes detection results from multiple detectors and adjusts subsequent detection operations. When false negatives are detected, the system feeds back to re-detect those objects using appropriate detectors, continuously improving detection precision while maintaining false positive reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection using a first detector that is fast and simple, then prepares for subsequent verification detection using a second detector with different performance characteristics. This preliminary action allows the system to efficiently process most cases while reserving detailed verification for cases that require it, balancing speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If detection is performed on the whole image using a first detector, then processing speed is maintained, but detection precision for all objects cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoiddetection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the image are processed with different detection qualities. The first detector processes the entire image with standard precision for speed, while the second detector applies enhanced precision to specific regions or objects identified as needing verification. This local quality approach maintains overall processing speed while ensuring high precision where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying maximum detection precision to the entire image (excessive action), the system applies partial action by using a faster, less precise detector for most of the image and reserving enhanced precision for only the necessary portions. This balances processing speed with detection precision by applying the higher precision only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9489737B2Object detection apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2016.11.08 TOSHIBA DIGITAL SOLUTIONS CORP
  • US9489737B2 patent drawing
  • US9489737B2 patent drawing
  • US9489737B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, an object detection apparatus includes an acquisition unit, a first detector, a determination unit, and a second detector. The acquisition unit acquires frames in a time-series manner. The first detector detects a predetermined object in each of the frames. The determination unit stores detection results corresponding to the frames, compares a first detection result corresponding to a first frame of the frames with a second detection result corresponding to a second frame of the frames, and determines whether false negative of the predetermined object exists in the second frame. The second detector detects the predetermined object in the second frames when it is determined that false negative of the predetermined object exists. The second detector differs in performance from the first detector.