Object Detection Layer Selection and Result Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional object detection methods face reduced accuracy due to limiting the search layer to the same layer for both first and second detections, and using different models for each detection, which can lead to suboptimal detection results.

Innovation Solution

The method involves generating multiple layer images by scaling the input image, performing initial detection on these images, selecting the most appropriate layer for further detection based on learned data, and integrating the results from both detection steps to enhance accuracy and speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the search layer is limited to the same layer for both first and second detections, then processing speed is improved, but detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically selects the search layer for the second detection based on the detection results of the first detection and learned data, rather than statically limiting to the same layer. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize between speed and accuracy for each specific detection scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the layer parameter for the second detection based on learned data and first detection results. By adjusting which layer to search in the second detection, the system can improve accuracy when needed while maintaining speed when the same layer is appropriate, resolving the contradiction between processing speed and detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If different models are used for the first detection and the second detection, then detection coverage is improved, but detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the detection results from the first detection as feedback to determine the search layer for the second detection. This feedback mechanism ensures that the second detection builds upon the first detection results, improving overall accuracy while maintaining comprehensive coverage through the two-stage approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The first detection serves as a preliminary action that identifies potential target regions. Based on these preliminary results and learned data, the system then performs a more focused second detection, ensuring both broad coverage and high accuracy in the final detection results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If multiple layer images are generated and all are searched, then detection accuracy is improved, but processing speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and utilizes learned data about which layers are most likely to contain targets. This extracted knowledge is then applied to selectively limit the search to only the most relevant layers, eliminating unnecessary searches in other layers and thus maintaining high accuracy while improving processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of performing detection on all generated layer images, the patent performs detection on only the necessary subset of layers determined by learned data and first detection results. This partial action approach avoids excessive processing while still achieving comprehensive and accurate detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10395103B2Object detection method, object detection apparatus, and program
Publication Date: 2019.08.27 CANON KK
  • US10395103B2 patent drawing
  • US10395103B2 patent drawing
  • US10395103B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An object detection method includes an image acquisition step of acquiring an image including a target object, a layer image generation step of generating a plurality of layer images by one or both of enlarging and reducing the image at a plurality of different scales, a first detection step of detecting a region of at least a part of the target object as a first detected region from each of the layer images, a selection step of selecting at least one of the layer images based on the detected first detected region and learning data learned in advance, a second detection step of detecting a region of at least a part of the target object in the selected layer image as a second detected region, and an integration step of integrating a detection result detected in the first detection step and a detection result detected in the second detection step.