Object Detection Region Selection for Constant-Speed Edge Inference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing object detection methods struggle to maintain high accuracy and processing speed when applied to high-definition images in resource-limited environments, such as edge terminals, due to increased calculation demands and errors in image synthesis or division.

Innovation Solution

An object detection device and method that adaptively selects a fixed number of rectangles for object detection based on object distribution and past frames, using density estimation and priority scoring to reduce the number of rectangles processed, while maintaining a constant processing speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If image division is applied to high-definition video for object detection, then detection coverage is improved, but processing time increases and accuracy decreases due to large number of divisions and synthesis errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the image into multiple regions and performing object detection on each region separately. This allows parallel processing of different image portions, reducing overall processing time while maintaining comprehensive detection coverage across the entire high-definition image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary processing by generating candidate bounding boxes and filtering them before final object detection. This preliminary action reduces the number of regions requiring full detection processing, thereby decreasing processing time while preserving detection accuracy for relevant objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If adaptive image division is used to reduce division number, then processing speed improves, but detection accuracy may decline when division number becomes too large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the number and size of image divisions based on the detected objects and scene characteristics. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to process fewer regions when objects are concentrated, improving processing speed, while maintaining sufficient division granularity when needed to preserve detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes processing parameters such as the number of divisions and region sizes based on input image characteristics and object distribution. This parameter adjustment optimizes the balance between processing speed and detection accuracy for different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If object detection is applied to all divided images, then detection completeness is improved, but calculation resources are exhausted in resource-limited environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection completenessVSAvoidcalculation resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and processes only the most relevant image regions containing potential objects, rather than uniformly processing all divided images. This extraction approach reduces calculation resource consumption by focusing computational efforts on areas with high detection probability while maintaining detection completeness for actual objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial processing by performing full object detection only on regions with high object probability, while using simplified or skipped processing for low-probability regions. This partial action reduces overall calculation resource consumption while maintaining sufficient detection completeness for actual objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260080652A1Object detection device, object detection method, and object detection program
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 NT T INC
  • US20260080652A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080652A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080652A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Object detection with high accuracy can be realized while maintaining a constant processing speed even in a limited environment of resources.An object detection device includes a rectangle extraction unit that extracts a plurality of rectangles to be candidates to which object detection is applied from an input image, a rectangle selection unit that selects a fixed number of rectangles to which the object detection is applied from among the rectangle candidates extracted from the rectangle extraction unit, and an object detection unit that performs the object detection on the rectangle selected by the rectangle selection unit to output metadata including at least a class, reliability, and a bounding box of the object included in the input image as an object detection result.