3D Object Detection Using Sensor Data Diversity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current object detection systems in robotics and autonomous systems are limited by their reliance on two-dimensional (2D) planar laser rangefinders or lidar, which struggle to detect objects in three-dimensional (3D) spaces, such as flying or hanging objects, and may require preconfigured algorithms that are not flexible enough for varying detection zone requirements.

Innovation Solution

The system employs multiple analysis techniques for object detection in detection zones, utilizing computational diversity and implementational diversity by running different techniques on various computing platforms. This approach enhances the robustness and accuracy of object detection by allowing for real-time adjustments and improved handling of latency and depth quantization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a 2D planar laser rangefinder or lidar is used to sweep a circular plane, then the detection system can identify objects within the circular plane, but it cannot properly detect objects in 3D spaces such as flying or hanging objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection space coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from 2D planar laser rangefinders to 3D time-of-flight sensors that can detect objects in three-dimensional space. The sensor array captures depth information across multiple dimensions, enabling detection of flying, hanging, and other objects that exist outside the traditional 2D detection plane. This dimensional expansion resolves the contradiction by maintaining detection precision while significantly improving adaptability to various spatial configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If a particular detection algorithm is preconfigured to calculate a specific set of disparities, then the algorithm can process data efficiently, but it cannot be adjusted at inference time to meet varying detection zone requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection processing speedVSAvoiddetection zone flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of detection parameters at inference time. The system allows modification of detection zone specifications, disparity calculation parameters, and analysis technique selection based on real-time requirements. This dynamic capability enables the system to adapt to varying detection scenarios while maintaining efficient processing through optimized algorithm selection and parameter configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables changeable detection parameters including detection zone boundaries, depth ranges, and analysis technique parameters. By allowing parameter adjustment at inference time rather than requiring fixed preconfiguration, the system achieves both flexibility for different detection scenarios and maintained processing efficiency through parameter-optimized algorithm execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple analysis techniques are implemented on different computing platforms, then the system achieves greater robustness and diversity in object detection, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection robustnessVSAvoidcomputing platform diversity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the detection system into multiple independent analysis techniques that can be executed on different computing platforms. Each technique processes sensor data independently using different algorithms and computational approaches. This segmentation provides robustness through diversity while managing complexity by allowing each segment to be optimized and implemented separately on suitable hardware platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250061597A1Perception diversity for identification of objects in robotics systems and applications
Publication Date: 2025.02.20 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20250061597A1 patent drawing
  • US20250061597A1 patent drawing
  • US20250061597A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to detecting objects in detection zones using multiple analysis techniques. The multiple analysis techniques may be used to analyze sensor data corresponding to the detection zones. The multiple analysis techniques may be selected based at least on at least two of the analysis techniques of the multiple analysis techniques having a computational diversity by performing different types of computational analyses on the sensor data with respect to each other, and at least two analysis techniques of the multiple analysis techniques having implementation diversity by being implemented on different types of computing platforms with respect to each other.