Object Detection Templates for Irregular Container Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robots lack the sophistication to duplicate human interactions required for executing complex tasks, particularly in identifying and retrieving objects from containers where they are irregularly arranged.

Innovation Solution

A computing system generates a set of object recognition templates that account for various viewpoints and appearances of an object, allowing robots to accurately identify and retrieve objects by adjusting detection hypotheses and validating them using multiple validation scores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional object detection methods are used, then the system is simple to implement, but the detection precision and accuracy are insufficient for irregularly arranged objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating multiple detection hypotheses and validation scores before final object identification. The computing system creates a set of possible object locations, orientations, and appearances, then validates each hypothesis against multiple criteria (template matching scores, contour alignment scores, area ratios) to determine the correct object. This preliminary hypothesis generation and validation process enables high detection precision for irregularly arranged objects without requiring complex real-time adjustments during detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional two-dimensional image matching to three-dimensional object modeling by generating detection hypotheses that include depth information, object orientations, and multiple viewpoints. The computing system creates 3D bounding boxes, determines object poses relative to camera optical axes, and validates hypotheses using multi-dimensional parameters including area ratios, contour alignments, and template matching scores across different spatial dimensions. This dimensional expansion enables accurate detection of irregularly arranged objects in complex container environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multiple validation scores and hypotheses are used, then the accuracy of object identification improves, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial validation by using multiple scoring criteria (template matching, contour alignment, area ratio) but only requiring that hypotheses meet threshold values on these partial checks rather than exhaustive verification. The computing system generates excessive detection hypotheses initially, then filters them through progressive validation stages, keeping only those that satisfy minimum thresholds on multiple partial criteria. This approach achieves high identification accuracy while avoiding the time cost of exhaustive validation of all possible hypotheses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where validation scores from each hypothesis are fed back into the detection process. The computing system calculates template matching scores, contour alignment scores, and area ratios for each hypothesis, then uses this feedback to eliminate invalid hypotheses and refine the search. This iterative feedback loop allows the system to converge on accurate object identification efficiently by learning from validation results and adjusting subsequent hypothesis generation, rather than performing exhaustive checks on all possibilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system handles irregularly arranged objects in containers, then the versatility of the robotic system improves, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring objects increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling versatilityVSAvoiddetection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by implementing a multi-functional detection framework that handles diverse object types, arrangements, and container configurations through a single unified approach. The computing system generates detection hypotheses that accommodate various object orientations, positions, and appearances using the same template matching, contour alignment, and area ratio validation processes. This universal detection methodology enables the robotic system to handle irregularly arranged objects in containers across different industries and applications without requiring task-specific customization, thereby improving versatility while managing detection difficulty through consistent multi-criteria validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12430878B2Systems and methods for object detection
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 MUJIN INC
  • US12430878B2 patent drawing
  • US12430878B2 patent drawing
  • US12430878B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing system including a processing circuit in communication with a camera having a field of view. The processing circuit is configured to perform operations related to detecting, identifying, and retrieving objects disposed amongst a plurality of objects. The processing circuit may be configured to perform operations related to object recognition template generation, feature generation, hypothesis generation, hypothesis refinement, and hypothesis validation.