Unified AI Training Platform for Multi-Format Object Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional AI model training systems are closed-source, limited to specific data annotation conventions and input file formats, restrictive in configuring and optimizing trained networks, and compatible with only a small proportion of model/engine output formats and third-party plugins.

Innovation Solution

A unified training platform that unifies preprocessing, configuration, training, and evaluation of multiple neural network-based object detection algorithms, allowing for neural network-agnostic data annotation formatting and full accessibility to network optimizations, including a universal model converter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional closed-source training systems are used, then system stability is maintained, but adaptability to different data formats and model architectures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with different data formats and model architecturesVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The training platform is designed as a universal system that can handle multiple data annotation conventions (YOLO, VOC, COCO, etc.) and train various neural network architectures (YOLOv3, YOLOv4, YOLOv5, SSD, etc.) through a single unified interface, eliminating the need for separate training systems for different formats and models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The platform introduces universal data converters and format adapters that act as intermediaries between different data sources and the training engine, allowing seamless conversion between various annotation formats without requiring changes to the core training system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple data annotation conventions are supported, then adaptability improves, but data preprocessing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for multiple annotation conventionsVSAvoidpreprocessing pipeline complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The platform merges multiple data conversion functionalities into a single unified preprocessing module that can handle YOLO, VOC, COCO, and other annotation formats through integrated conversion routines, simplifying the overall preprocessing architecture while maintaining multi-format support

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses configurable parameters and settings to adapt the preprocessing pipeline to different data formats, allowing dynamic adjustment of conversion rules and parameters without requiring separate processing workflows for each annotation convention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If extensive model optimizations are enabled, then model performance improves, but training time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performance and accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The training platform provides dynamic optimization options that can be adjusted during the training process, allowing users to enable or disable specific optimization techniques (such as mixed precision training, gradient accumulation, or advanced augmentations) based on performance requirements and time constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs parameter tuning and hyperparameter optimization capabilities that automatically adjust training parameters to achieve optimal performance within given time constraints, balancing model accuracy with training efficiency through systematic parameter exploration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive evaluation metrics are used, then measurement precision improves, but computational overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance evaluation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources for evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation module implements a tiered metrics approach where essential metrics (such as mAP, precision, recall) are calculated by default, while more comprehensive but computationally intensive metrics can be selectively enabled based on specific evaluation needs, allowing users to balance evaluation thoroughness with resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12511891B2Unified AI model training platform
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 ZEROEYES INC
  • US12511891B2 patent drawing
  • US12511891B2 patent drawing
  • US12511891B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, apparatuses and non-transitory computer executable media configured to unify preprocessing, configuration, training, monitoring, and evaluation of multiple neural network based object detection algorithms under a singular development environment/platform (i.e., a “unified training platform”). The unified training platform may include a neural network agnostic model training environment that addresses the deficiencies described above and may allow for unified data annotation formatting. In addition to incorporating a wide variety of state-of-the-art neural networks into the unified training platform, the unified training platform may also provide full accessibility to available network optimizations. The present disclosure may also include a universal model converter.