3D Object Landmark Projection for Robust Pose Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing methods struggle to accurately estimate the pose of objects and identify deformations, movements, or obscuration in multi-object arrangements and deformed objects, particularly when landmarks are obscured or have significant positional deviations.

Innovation Solution

A method involving landmark detection, relative pose estimation, and projection of three-dimensional model landmarks into a two-dimensional space for comparison with detected landmarks, with iterative refinement of landmark selection to achieve threshold correspondence, allowing identification of outliers for deformation, movement, or obscuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If landmarks are detected in images to estimate pose, then pose estimation can be performed, but accuracy deteriorates when landmarks are obscured or have significant positional deviations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepose estimation accuracyVSAvoidlandmark detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The method segments the set of detected landmarks into multiple subsets and iteratively tests each subset to determine which provides the most accurate pose estimation. By dividing the complete landmark set into smaller groups and evaluating them separately, the system can identify reliable landmarks even when some are obscured or deviate significantly from expected positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback by comparing projected landmarks (from 3D model) with detected landmarks (from 2D image) and using this comparison to evaluate pose estimation accuracy. This feedback loop allows the system to identify which landmark subsets yield the most accurate results and iteratively refine the selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If all detected landmarks are used for pose estimation, then processing is simplified, but deformation detection capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoiddeformation detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The method segments landmarks into subsets and systematically evaluates each subset's contribution to pose estimation accuracy. This segmentation allows the system to identify which landmarks indicate deformation (those that deviate significantly from projected positions) while maintaining manageable processing complexity through structured evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by treating different landmarks differently based on their characteristics. Landmarks are evaluated individually for their deviation from expected positions, and those showing significant deviations are identified as potential deformation indicators. This allows precise deformation detection by focusing attention on problematic landmarks rather than treating all landmarks uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If iterative refinement of landmark selection is performed, then pose estimation accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepose estimation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The method applies partial action by testing only a subset of landmark combinations rather than exhaustively evaluating all possible combinations. By strategically selecting and testing representative subsets, the system achieves sufficient accuracy without the computational burden of complete exhaustive search, thus reducing processing time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback mechanism compares projected and detected landmarks to quickly evaluate pose estimation quality, allowing the system to terminate iteration early when sufficient accuracy is achieved. This feedback-driven approach prevents unnecessary computational steps and optimizes processing time by stopping refinement once the threshold for acceptable accuracy is met.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12541876B2Processing images of objects and object portions, including multi-object arrangements and deformed objects
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 INAIT SA
  • US12541876B2 patent drawing
  • US12541876B2 patent drawing
  • US12541876B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of image processing can include receiving an image of an instance of an object and a three-dimensional model of the object, detecting a first plurality of landmarks of the instance of the object in the two-dimensional image, estimating a pose of the instance of the object in the received image relative to an imaging device that acquired the image, wherein the relative pose in the received image is estimated from the first plurality of the detected landmarks, using the estimated relative pose, projecting landmarks from the three-dimensional model of the object into a dimensional space of the received image of the instance of the object, comparing, in the dimensional space, characteristics of corresponding of the projected landmarks and the first plurality of the detected landmarks, and determining whether a threshold level of positional correspondence exists between positions of corresponding of the projected landmarks and the first plurality of the detected landmarks.