Object Tracking Across Non-Overlapping Camera Fields

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing camera-based monitoring systems face challenges in continuously tracking objects across networks of cameras with overlapping and non-overlapping fields-of-view, especially in large areas, where cameras are positioned to maximize coverage without overlapping views, and strict security requirements demand continuous object tracking.

Innovation Solution

A Bayesian methodology using a sequential Monte-Carlo approach for image-based tracking, combining color and shape information, and deploying a system with a manager module, image processor, and user interface to initiate and resume tracking across cameras, leveraging topological proximity and Quality of Service concepts to allocate computing resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If cameras are positioned to maximize coverage area, then the coverage area increases, but the fields-of-view become non-overlapping making continuous tracking difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidcontinuous tracking
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes topological relationships between cameras and defines expected transition paths for tracked objects. When an object approaches a camera boundary, the system proactively prepares the next camera in the sequence by pre-loading tracking parameters and establishing handover readiness, enabling seamless transitions across non-overlapping fields-of-view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A central server acts as an intermediary that coordinates tracking information across multiple cameras. The server receives tracking data from individual cameras, maintains object state information, and distributes appropriate tracking parameters to cameras based on predicted object movement, enabling continuous tracking across camera boundaries without requiring overlapping fields-of-view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Quantity of substance

If the number of cameras is limited, then the system cost decreases, but the ability to track objects across large areas deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of camerasVSAvoidtracking area
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically allocates computing resources and adjusts tracking parameters based on real-time object position and movement patterns. Cameras actively track objects with adaptive parameter adjustment, and the system dynamically determines when and where to hand off tracking between cameras, maximizing the effective tracking area with a limited number of cameras.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from spatial distribution of cameras to temporal sequencing of tracking. By using topological relationships and predicted object trajectories, the system extends tracking capability across time dimensions, allowing a limited number of cameras to cover large areas through coordinated sequential tracking rather than simultaneous spatial coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If computing resources are distributed across all cameras, then tracking robustness improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking robustnessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments tracking functionality into two parts: local cameras perform basic object detection and tracking within their own fields-of-view, while the central server handles cross-camera coordination and state management. This segmentation allows robust tracking without requiring each camera to process all tracking data, reducing individual camera complexity while maintaining overall system robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The central server serves as an intermediary that centralizes complex tracking logic and state management. Individual cameras send raw tracking data to the server, which performs sophisticated parameter adjustment, handover coordination, and state prediction. This intermediary approach maintains tracking robustness by centralizing intelligence while keeping individual camera units simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7720257B2Object tracking system
Publication Date: 2010.05.18 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US7720257B2 patent drawing
  • US7720257B2 patent drawing
  • US7720257B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for tracking objects across an area having a network of cameras with overlapping and non-overlapping fields of view. The system may use a combination of color, shape, texture and/or multi-resolution histograms for object representation or target modeling for the tacking of an object from one camera to another. The system may include user and output interfacing.