Objective-Based Vehicle Service Scheduling From Telematics Forecasts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle maintenance schedules fail to account for the varying usage patterns of individual machines, leading to over-maintenance or under-maintenance, resulting in waste or undue risk, as they are based on simple measures of time or usage that do not consider the unique conditions and health of each vehicle.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system for objective-based scheduling of vehicle servicing that utilizes vehicle telematics data, including fault codes and component wear metrics, to generate service event forecasts and schedules, prioritizing availability and cost reduction based on an objective function.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If maintenance is performed according to fixed time or usage intervals, then machine reliability is improved, but maintenance costs increase due to over-maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the maintenance parameter from fixed time/usage intervals to dynamic condition-based thresholds. It continuously monitors actual machine conditions (vibration, temperature, wear particles) and adjusts maintenance timing based on real-time parameter changes, enabling maintenance only when actually needed rather than on a fixed schedule.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The machine performs self-diagnosis through integrated sensors and monitoring systems that automatically detect degradation and trigger maintenance alerts. The system serves itself by identifying when maintenance is needed without external intervention, reducing both over-maintenance and unexpected failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of substance

If maintenance is delayed to reduce costs, then maintenance costs decrease, but machine reliability deteriorates due to under-maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance costsVSAvoidmachine reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensor data from the machine is constantly monitored and compared against degradation thresholds. When parameters indicate approaching failure conditions, the system automatically generates maintenance alerts, ensuring timely intervention before reliability deteriorates while avoiding unnecessary early maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of degradation trends through continuous monitoring and predicts potential failures before they occur. By identifying early signs of wear or abnormal conditions, it enables proactive maintenance scheduling that prevents reliability deterioration while optimizing maintenance timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If simple time-based scheduling is used, then scheduling complexity is reduced, but adaptability to individual machine conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling complexityVSAvoidadaptability to machine conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal monitoring platform that can adapt to multiple machine types and conditions through configurable parameters and thresholds. The same core system serves different machines by adjusting monitoring parameters rather than requiring separate scheduling systems for each machine, maintaining simplicity while enabling customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If individualized maintenance schedules are created for each machine, then adaptability to machine conditions is improved, but scheduling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to machine conditionsVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each machine effectively creates its own maintenance schedule through self-monitoring and automatic alert generation based on its specific condition parameters. The central system receives standardized alerts from multiple machines and schedules maintenance based on predicted failure times, distributing the complexity management across the fleet rather than requiring centralized complex scheduling for each individual machine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250278702A1Methods And Computing Systems for Objective-Based Scheduling Of Vehicle Servicing
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 ANSIK
  • US20250278702A1 patent drawing
  • US20250278702A1 patent drawing
  • US20250278702A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for objective-based scheduling of vehicle servicing include: storing an objective function for prioritizing vehicle availability and vehicle maintenance cost reduction; receiving vehicle telemetry data for a vehicle; generating a vehicle service event forecast at least partially based on the vehicle telemetry data; and scheduling a vehicle service event for the vehicle related to the vehicle telemetry data at least partially based on the vehicle service event forecast and the objective function.