Oblique Slats Deflect Shock Waves in Explosion-Resistant Walls

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing explosion-proof and bullet-proof wall constructions are complex, costly, heavy, and inefficient, failing to provide effective protection in a simple and cost-effective manner.

Innovation Solution

A wall construction comprising two barriers with obliquely directed protective slats that absorb and deflect shock waves and projectiles, transferring forces to vertical frames and the ground, with an innermost empty zone to disperse energy, and a self-supporting framework for rapid assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional explosion-proof and bullet-proof wall constructions are used, then protection against explosions and bullets is provided, but the construction becomes complex, heavy, and expensive to reconstruct

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wall construction is divided into multiple functional layers: a first barrier with obliquely directed slats for shock wave deflection, an innermost empty zone for energy dispersion, and a second barrier for final protection. This segmentation allows each layer to perform a specific function, simplifying the overall design while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protective slats are arranged obliquely rather than vertically or horizontally, creating a three-dimensional configuration that efficiently deflects shock waves and projectiles. This angular arrangement in multiple dimensions provides superior protection compared to conventional flat wall structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If conventional explosion-proof and bullet-proof wall constructions are used, then protection against explosions and bullets is provided, but the construction becomes heavy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidwall weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the wall into separate functional barriers with an empty zone between them, the design eliminates the need for heavy concrete or steel monolithic structures. Each barrier can be constructed from lighter materials optimized for its specific protective function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The innermost empty zone acts as a cushioning space that absorbs and disperses explosion energy before it reaches the second barrier. This pre-cushioning effect reduces the structural requirements and weight of the protective barriers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If conventional explosion-proof and bullet-proof wall constructions are used, then protection against explosions and bullets is provided, but the construction is expensive to reconstruct

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidconstruction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The modular segmented design allows individual barriers and slats to be replaced independently if damaged, rather than requiring complete wall replacement. This reduces reconstruction costs and time while maintaining protection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The slats and barrier elements are designed as replaceable components that can be easily substituted if damaged by explosions or projectiles, providing a cost-effective solution compared to replacing entire heavy-duty protective walls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Reliability

If conventional explosion-proof and bullet-proof wall constructions are used, then protection against explosions and bullets is provided, but the construction is not efficient in absorbing shock waves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock wave absorptionVSAvoidconstruction simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The oblique arrangement of slats at specific angles creates efficient shock wave deflection paths. The three-dimensional angular configuration naturally channels and dissipates explosion energy, providing superior shock wave absorption with a simple geometric design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The empty innermost zone, which might seem like wasted space, actually serves as an efficient energy absorption chamber that converts explosion kinetic energy into dispersed motion, protecting the protected object without requiring complex active protection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a lightweight, simple, and cost-effective wall construction that effectively blocks explosions and projectiles, with a mirror-symmetrical design allowing quick construction and efficient energy dissipation, preventing penetration and offering protection against various threats.

Implementation Method 1

the slats extend horizontally between a first post and a second, adjacent post of a barrier, wherein the protective slats are directed obliquely upwards, extending from outside to inside, in order to absorb a shock wave of an incoming explosion or an incoming projectile and to deflect it upwards

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave: Shock Wave

Data Source

PatentEP2975198B1Explosion and bullet resistant wall construction
Publication Date: 2017.02.22 A AALBERS HLDG
  • EP2975198B1 patent drawing
  • EP2975198B1 patent drawing
  • EP2975198B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to an explosion-proof and bullet-proof wall construction(10), comprising: - a first barrier (12A) and a second barrier(12B), - a plurality of barrier connections (16) between the first and second barrier in the form of vertical frames (15), wherein each vertical frame comprises a first post (14A), which is associated with the first barrier, and comprises a second post (14B), which is associated with the second barrier, and wherein each vertical frame further comprises connections (39) between the first and second post, - an innermost zone (18), which is located between the first and second barrier, wherein at least one barrier comprises a plurality of protective slats (20), wherein the protective slats are directed obliquely upwards, extending from outside to inside, in order to absorb a shock wave of an incoming explosion or an incoming projectile and to deflect it upwards.