Oblique Tube Array for Localized Impact Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional body protecting devices, such as safety helmets, often provide uniform energy absorption, which is inefficient as impacts frequently occur at specific areas and some body parts are more prone to severe injuries, making it costly to produce high protection across all locations.

Innovation Solution

A body protecting device featuring an array of energy absorbing cells with tubes arranged at oblique angles to the impact surface, providing deflecting means for lateral deflection and varying stiffness, integrated with a core and outer layers for enhanced energy absorption and localized protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If uniform energy absorption is provided across all locations, then protection level is consistent throughout the device, but production cost increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection level consistencyVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the density and arrangement of energy absorbing portions specifically at locations prone to frequent impacts or severe injuries. The liner includes between two and ten portions of varying density, with higher density materials positioned at critical impact zones rather than uniformly across the entire helmet, thereby providing enhanced protection where needed while reducing material costs in less critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If high level of protection is provided at all locations, then user safety is maximized, but device complexity and production difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by concentrating high-density energy absorbing portions at specific locations identified as prone to frequent impacts or severe injuries, while using lower density materials in other areas. This localized approach maximizes user safety at critical zones without requiring the entire device to be constructed with complex, high-protection materials throughout, thereby reducing overall device complexity and production difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If conventional hard foam material is used for energy absorption, then device structure is simple, but impact energy absorption efficiency is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidimpact energy absorption efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining conventional hard foam material with additional energy absorbing portions of varying density arranged in specific patterns. This composite structure integrates the simplicity of foam manufacturing with the enhanced energy absorption efficiency of strategically placed high-density portions, achieving superior impact energy absorption without substantially increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The oblique arrangement of tubes in the body protecting device allows for controlled and steady energy absorption, reducing impact force and increasing protection at critical areas, outperforming conventional designs by distributing the impact over a longer time period and providing optimal protection without substantial wastage.

Implementation Method 1

metal columns exhibit a multiple local buckling and folding failure mode which is effective in absorbing impact energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuckling:

Implementation Method 2

metal columns exhibit a multiple local buckling and folding failure mode which is effective in absorbing impact energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFolding:

Implementation Method 3

The rigid outer skin acts as an impact surface to transmit an impact load more evenly to the inner skin which absorbs the energy imparted by the impact load

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact Force:

Implementation Method 4

the longitudinal axis of the tubes of one or more of said cells is arranged at an oblique angle to the impact surface... provides deflecting means for lateral deflection of the impact of an impacting object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLateral deflection:

Implementation Method 5

Columns tend to produce a relatively constant level of energy absorption as the column is progressively buckled or crushed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProgressive crushing:

Implementation Method 6

distributing the impact over a longer time period... controlled and steady energy absorption

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption:

Data Source

PatentEP1942759B1Body protecting device
Publication Date: 2011.09.07 LLOYD (SCOTLAND) LTD
  • EP1942759B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP1942759B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3a
  • EP1942759B1 patent drawingFigure 3b

AI summary

A body protecting device for wearing by a user comprising: an impact surface; and an array of energy absorbing cells, wherein each of said cells comprises a tube, and wherein the longitudinal axis of the tubes of one or more of said cells is arranged at an oblique angle to the impact surface.