Obstacle Detection System with Segmented Warning Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Operators of movable machines at work sites often ignore warnings from obstacle detection systems due to frequent alerts for known obstacles, potentially missing unknown obstacles that have entered the area.

Innovation Solution

An obstacle detection system that includes an electronic map of known obstacles, distinct warning zones for known and unknown obstacles, and a controller to differentiate between them, generating specific alert signals for each type of obstacle based on its proximity to the machine.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the object detection system generates warnings for all detected obstacles, then obstacle safety monitoring is improved, but operator alert fatigue increases and warnings are ignored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle safety monitoringVSAvoidoperator response to warnings
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments obstacles into two categories: known obstacles (stored in electronic map) and unknown obstacles (not in electronic map). This segmentation allows the system to apply different warning strategies - suppressing routine warnings for known obstacles while maintaining vigilant warnings for unknown obstacles, thereby reducing alert fatigue while preserving safety monitoring effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic map serves as an intermediary data structure that mediates between raw sensor detections and warning generation. By comparing detected objects against the electronic map, the system determines whether each object is known or unknown, enabling differentiated warning behavior without requiring direct operator assessment of each obstacle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system provides continuous warnings for known obstacles, then complete obstacle monitoring is maintained, but operator awareness of unknown obstacles decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle monitoring completenessVSAvoidoperator awareness of unknown obstacles
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the warning stream into two distinct channels: one for known obstacles and one for unknown obstacles. This segmentation prevents the dilution of important unknown obstacle warnings by numerous known obstacle warnings, maintaining operator awareness while preserving monitoring completeness through separate tracking of both obstacle types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different warning qualities to different obstacle types. Known obstacles receive suppressed or minimized warnings (lower priority), while unknown obstacles receive prominent, high-priority warnings. This local differentiation in warning quality ensures that critical information about unknown obstacles is not lost amid routine notifications about known obstacles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If the system uses a single warning zone for all obstacles, then system complexity is reduced, but safety precision for different obstacle types deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning zone configurationVSAvoidsafety distance precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the warning zone into two distinct zones: a known obstacle warning zone and an unknown obstacle warning zone. Each zone can have independently configured safety distances and warning thresholds, allowing precise safety parameters for each obstacle type without requiring a complex multi-zone system for each individual object.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different safety distance parameters locally to different obstacle types. Known obstacles may have larger acceptable safety margins since they are tracked and predictable, while unknown obstacles trigger warnings at larger distances due to their unpredictable nature. This local parameter differentiation achieves precision without requiring a fully customized zone for each obstacle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9457718B2Obstacle detection system
Publication Date: 2016.10.04 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US9457718B2 patent drawing
  • US9457718B2 patent drawing
  • US9457718B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An obstacle detection system includes an object detection system, an alert system, and a controller. The controller is configured to store an electronic map containing a known obstacle, store known and unknown obstacle warning zones, and detect a detected object in proximity to the machine. The controller is further configured to compare the detected object to the known obstacle to determine whether the detected object is a known obstacle or an unknown obstacle, generate a first alert signal if the detected object is a known obstacle and within the known obstacle warning zone, and generate a second alert signal if the detected object is an unknown obstacle and within the unknown obstacle warning zone.