Vehicle Obstacle Determination via Propagation Path Difference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing obstacle detection systems for vehicles face challenges in accurately determining obstacles, often leading to erroneous classifications, such as identifying non-colliding objects like beams as obstacles, which can result in unnecessary safety controls and affect vehicle travel.

Innovation Solution

An obstacle determination apparatus that uses a first and second determiner to calculate the difference in propagation distance or time between a first round-trip and second round-trip paths of detection waves, with the second determiner determining whether the object is an obstacle based on the difference, thereby improving accuracy by distinguishing between collision-causing and non-causing objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional obstacle detection systems use single-detector reflection intensity measurement, then the system structure is simple, but the determination accuracy of obstacles deteriorates leading to erroneous classifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle determination accuracyVSAvoiddetection system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple independent detectors (first detector and second detector) positioned at different locations. Each detector independently measures reflection intensity, and the results are combined through logical operations to determine obstacle presence. This segmentation enables more accurate obstacle determination by cross-validating measurements from multiple positions, thereby resolving the contradiction between simple structure and accurate determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from single-point detection to multi-point spatial detection by positioning detectors at different locations (first position and second position). This adds a spatial dimension to the detection process, allowing the system to analyze reflection intensity patterns across multiple positions to distinguish true obstacles from false detections, thus improving determination accuracy without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the system uses multiple detectors at different positions to improve determination accuracy, then obstacle classification accuracy improves, but the complexity of data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle classification reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where the determination results from the first and second detectors are continuously compared and validated. The logical combination of detection results provides feedback that confirms or refutes obstacle classifications, improving reliability by cross-validating measurements and eliminating erroneous determinations through iterative verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter being measured from single-point reflection intensity to multi-point reflection intensity patterns. By analyzing the spatial distribution of reflection intensity across multiple detectors, the system achieves more reliable obstacle classification while managing processing complexity through structured comparison protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances obstacle determination accuracy, reducing erroneous safety controls and improving vehicle travel by accurately identifying obstacles and non-obstacles, thus preventing unnecessary limit controls.

Implementation Method 1

transmitting a detection wave for detecting an object, and receiving a first reflection wave resulting from the transmitted detection wave being reflected from the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

a first determiner determining a difference in a propagation distance or a propagation time between a first round-trip path of a detection wave between a first position of a moving body and an object, and a second round-trip path of a detection wave from the first position to a second position of the moving body via the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of Flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentUS11668824B2Obstacle determination apparatus and vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.06.06 PANASONIC AUTOMOTIVE SYST CO LTD
  • US11668824B2 patent drawing
  • US11668824B2 patent drawing
  • US11668824B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an obstacle determination apparatus including: a first determiner determining a difference in a propagation distance or a propagation time between a first round-trip path of a detection wave and a second round-trip path of a detection wave; and a second determiner determining whether the object is an obstacle based on a determination result of the first determiner.