Obtuse L-Shaped Solebar for Railway Vehicle Loading Gauge Clearance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional solebars in railway vehicles restrict the size, shape, and volumetric capacity of the vehicle body while achieving loading gauge clearance, due to their channel-shaped cross-sectional profile, which does not conform well with the stepped profile of the upper sector loading gauge.

Innovation Solution

A solebar with an obtuse L-shaped cross-sectional profile, where the first leg extends downwardly to clear the lower sector loading gauge and the second leg extends upwardly at an incline to clear the upper sector loading gauge, optimizing the interior volume and mounting arrangement of the vehicle body.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional channel-shaped solebars are used to achieve loading gauge clearance, then loading gauge compliance is satisfied, but the size, shape and volumetric capacity of the railway vehicle body are restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading gauge clearanceVSAvoidvolumetric capacity of railway vehicle body
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The solebar is segmented into two distinct legs: a first leg extending downwardly to clear the lower sector loading gauge, and a second leg extending upwardly at an incline to clear the upper sector loading gauge. This segmentation allows each leg to independently address different loading gauge requirements, freeing up interior volume while maintaining compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a conventional horizontal channel-shaped solebar to a three-dimensional L-shaped configuration with vertical and inclined components. By utilizing the vertical dimension and creating an obtuse angle between legs, the design achieves loading gauge clearance without compromising interior volumetric capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If conventional channel-shaped solebars are used, then structural integrity is maintained, but the mounting arrangement of sidewalls is restricted and shape optimization is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrity of underframeVSAvoidshape and mounting flexibility of railway vehicle body
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The solebar employs an asymmetric L-shaped cross-sectional profile with an obtuse angle between the first and second legs, rather than a symmetric channel shape. This asymmetry provides differentiated mounting surfaces that accommodate the stepped profile of the loading gauge and enable optimized sidewall mounting arrangements for improved vehicle body shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the solebar are optimized for different functions: the first leg provides structural support and loading gauge clearance for the lower sector, while the second leg at an obtuse angle provides optimized mounting surfaces for sidewalls in the upper sector. This local optimization of shape and orientation enhances both structural integrity and mounting flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2958791B1Solebar for a railway vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.04.22 DRAX POWER
  • EP2958791B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2958791B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2958791B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a solebar (lb) for a railway vehicle having an elongate body that comprises a first leg (11) and a second leg (12), wherein the first leg and second are configured to meet at a vertex and have an obtuse angle 0 therebetween such that the solebar has an obtuse L-shaped cross-sectional profile. The solebar may be configured to be mounted as an underframe side member in a railway vehicle such that the first leg extends in a downwardly direction towards a floor supporting the railway vehicle and clears a lower sector loading gauge and the second leg inclines upwardly in a direction away from the railway vehicle and clears an upper sector loading gauge. The second leg may be configured to support an upper sidewall of the railway vehicle body such that the upper sidewall clears the upper sector of the loading gauge.