Occupancy-Based Door Access Control Without Manual Arming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing home automation and security systems require users to manually arm or disarm the system, leading to inefficiencies and potential misuse, especially when determining authorized access based on user location and identity.

Innovation Solution

A home automation system that continuously monitors user location and identity using a combination of sensors and communication technologies, allowing automatic authorization for access based on predefined criteria, eliminating the need for manual arming or disarming and enhancing security by differentiating between authorized and unauthorized access attempts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual arming or disarming is required, then system control is simple and direct, but user convenience deteriorates and potential misuse increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidsecurity reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines user identity and location using sensors and communication technologies, then autonomously authorizes access without requiring manual user intervention. The system serves itself by monitoring its own state and making access decisions based on predefined criteria, eliminating the need for users to manually arm or disarm the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors user location and identity information, processes this feedback data, and automatically adjusts access authorization accordingly. When the system detects that an authorized user is present, it automatically permits access; when unauthorized users are detected, it maintains security restrictions, creating a closed-loop control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system maintains constant readiness, then security response time is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity readinessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of maintaining continuous high-power monitoring, the system uses periodic sensing and event-triggered monitoring. Sensors are activated based on detected events or time intervals, allowing the system to maintain security readiness while reducing overall energy consumption compared to continuous full-power operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its operational state based on detected conditions. When no threats are detected, the system operates in a lower-power mode; when potential security events are detected, it transitions to higher-alertness states, optimizing the balance between security readiness and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12504728B2Managing barrier and occupancy based home automation system
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 VIVINT INC
  • US12504728B2 patent drawing
  • US12504728B2 patent drawing
  • US12504728B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are described for controlling access to a home based on user occupancy. According to at least one embodiment, an apparatus for controlling access to a home based on user occupancy includes a processor, a memory in electronic communication with the processor, and instructions stored in the memory which are executable by a processor to determine a location of a user of a home automation system relative to a barrier of a home being monitored by the home automation system. The instructions are executable to determine whether to permit a change in a locking mechanism of the barrier based in part on the determined location of the user, and maintain a current state of the home automation system.