Probabilistic Occupancy Mapping for Multi-Sensor Target Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As search missions progress, the log of potential target locations becomes unmanageable due to multiple sensor readings, leading to uncertainty and inefficiency in locating targets within a search area.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic probabilistic tracking method and system that generate an occupancy map, dividing the search area into cells, updating confidence levels based on sensor data, and removing detected targets from the list, allowing for efficient tracking and location of targets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple sensor readings are taken during search missions, then measurement precision improves, but the quantity of data and complexity of target location tracking increases uncontrollably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget location precisionVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The search area is divided into discrete grid cells, and the target location problem is segmented into tracking probabilities for each cell independently. This segmentation transforms the unmanageable continuous search space into discrete, manageable units that can be processed systematically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A probabilistic occupancy map is introduced as an intermediary data structure between sensor readings and target location determination. This map accumulates and processes multiple sensor readings through probability updates, mediating between raw data and final target location decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple sensor readings are accumulated, then target detection reliability improves, but the log size becomes unmanageable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget detection reliabilityVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter representation from storing raw sensor readings to storing probability values for each grid cell. This parameter transformation compresses the data volume while maintaining detection reliability through cumulative probability updates based on sensor readings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the search area is divided into discrete cells, then ease of operation improves, but the area coverage requires more data processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch area managementVSAvoiddata processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The search area is divided into discrete grid cells, making the search space manageable and easier to operate with. Each cell can be independently processed and updated, simplifying the overall search management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple sensor readings and observations are merged into a single probabilistic occupancy map that represents the entire search area. This merging consolidates data processing efforts and improves overall productivity by avoiding redundant processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP4283258A1System and method for tracking of search targets via dynamic probabilistic occupancy map
Publication Date: 2023.11.29 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC
  • EP4283258A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4283258A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4283258A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and method for dynamic probabilistic tracking of search targets within a search area (100) generates a displayable occupancy map (212) of the search area. The occupancy map is divided into individual map cells (300) and seeded with a list (214) of unlocated targets (e.g., targets of one or more types known or thought to be within the search area but which have not been precisely located therewithin). Each map cell of the occupancy map reflects the confidence or likelihood that an unlocated target will be detected within that cell. As a search mission proceeds, sensor datasets are received from the searching assets and correlated to identify unlocated targets. As unlocated targets are detected, located with sufficient accuracy, and removed from the list, the confidence levels (304, 306, 308, 310) of other map cells are reflected to indicate changes in the probability that any remaining unlocated targets will be detected therein.