Occupancy Sensor Video Analysis for Intrusion Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional security lighting systems fail to differentiate between innocent movements and potential intrusions, leading to unnecessary activation and potential false alarms, as they do not accurately assess changes in the environment.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses sensors to capture images or video frames, processes them with a microcontroller, and applies rules to differentiate between minor and major changes, such as wind-blown leaves or a car's appearance, to determine the likelihood of disparity, thereby triggering alerts only for significant events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional motion detectors activate the light upon detection of any motion, then the protected area is illuminated, but false alarms occur due to inability to differentiate between innocent moving objects and intruders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of intrusion detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of motion analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the motion detection task into multiple analysis stages: initial motion detection, image capture, feature extraction, pattern matching against stored profiles, and final determination. This segmentation allows complex analysis to be broken down into manageable steps, improving reliability without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing and storing profiles of innocent moving objects (animals, leaves, clouds) before actual monitoring begins. During operation, detected motion is compared against these pre-stored profiles to quickly determine if activation is warranted, reducing false alarms while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the system captures and analyzes multiple images to differentiate changes, then false alarms are reduced, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of occupancy detectionVSAvoidtime for image processing and analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by analyzing only the necessary portions of images - specifically focusing on regions where motion is detected rather than processing entire frames. This selective analysis reduces computational time and resources while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses itself to service the analysis task by comparing current images against its own stored profiles of innocent objects and typical environmental changes. This self-referential comparison enables rapid decision-making without requiring external database queries, reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system activates the light for any detected motion, then security coverage is maximized, but energy consumption increases due to unnecessary activations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidenergy consumption of lighting system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring detected objects against stored profiles and using this information to make intelligent activation decisions. The feedback loop analyzes motion patterns, compares them with known innocent objects, and only triggers lighting when genuine intrusions are detected, optimizing energy usage while maintaining security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting the activation threshold based on environmental context and stored profiles. Rather than using a fixed motion-detection threshold, the system dynamically adjusts sensitivity based on learned patterns of innocent versus suspicious motion, reducing unnecessary activations while maintaining reliable security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9681108B2Occupancy sensor and associated methods
Publication Date: 2017.06.13 LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORP
  • US9681108B2 patent drawing
  • US9681108B2 patent drawing
  • US9681108B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device to detect occupancy of an environment includes a sensor to capture video frames from a location in the environment. The device may compare rules with data using a rules engine. The microcontroller may include a processor and memory to produce results indicative of a condition of the environment. The device may also include an interface through which the data is accessible. The device may generate results respective to the location in the environment. The microcontroller may be in communication with a network. The video frames may be concatenated to create an overview to display the video frames substantially seamlessly respective to the location in which the sensor is positioned. The overview may be viewable using the interface and the results of the analysis performed by the rules engine may be accessible using the interface.