Occupant Anthropometric Data Analysis for Personalized Vehicle Seating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current seating systems in vehicles lack customization options to accommodate individual occupant preferences, leading to suboptimal comfort and safety, as they rely on generalized adjustments rather than personalized anthropometric data.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses computational devices and mobile terminals to collect and analyze occupant anthropometric data, calculating best-fit body arrangements and generating adjustment instructions for vehicle seats, including manual and automatic adjustment mechanisms, to customize seat dimensions and positions based on occupant-specific metrics such as height, weight, and gender.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If generalized seat adjustments are used, then device complexity is reduced, but occupant comfort and safety are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupant comfortVSAvoidseating system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes multiple seat parameters (position, angle, lumbar support, cushion firmness) based on occupant anthropometric data. The control system adjusts each parameter individually to achieve optimal comfort and safety for each occupant, transforming the seat configuration from a fixed generalized state to a dynamic personalized state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing occupants to input their own anthropometric data through a user interface, which then automatically generates and executes the personalized seat adjustment sequence without requiring manual adjustment of each parameter by the occupant or another person.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual measurement of anthropometric data is used, then measurement precision is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanthropometric data accuracyVSAvoiddata collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical measurement with optical scanning technology. A 3D scanner or camera system captures the occupant's body geometry and automatically processes the data to extract anthropometric parameters, eliminating the need for physical measuring tapes and manual recording while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-calculating the optimal seat adjustment sequence based on the scanned anthropometric data before the occupant even sits in the seat. This allows the seat to be pre-configured or to automatically adjust as the occupant approaches, reducing the actual setup time when the occupant needs to be seated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If automated seat adjustment is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat adjustment convenienceVSAvoidadjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by designing a multi-functional control system that can handle multiple types of seat adjustments (positioning, angling, lumbar support, cushion firmness) through a single integrated controller. This consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate control mechanisms into one universal system that processes anthropometric data and executes all necessary adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary software layer that translates anthropometric measurements into specific adjustment commands for the seat mechanisms. This software intermediary simplifies the complexity by providing a clear mapping between measured body parameters and required seat configurations, acting as a mediator between the sensor input and the mechanical adjustment output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If personalized seating arrangements are provided, then occupant safety is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupant safetyVSAvoidseating system production
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation by dividing the seat into independently controllable modules (base position, backrest angle, lumbar support, cushion firmness). This modular segmentation allows each component to be manufactured separately using standard processes, then integrated into a system that can be individually controlled through software, maintaining ease of manufacture while enabling personalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2625061B1System, methodologies, and components acquiring, analyzing, and using occupant body specifications for improved seating structures and environment configuration
Publication Date: 2020.06.24 FAURECIA AUTOMOTIVE SEATING LLC
  • EP2625061B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2625061B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2625061B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Equipment and processes generate a seating solution by obtaining occupant data, calculating body dimensions from the occupant data, and calculating a best-fit body arrangement for an occupant. Occupant data may be obtained in various ways using available computational devices and software or by manually measuring the relevant dimensions on the occupant. A user interface for inputting occupant metrics and/or occupant measurements may be provided in a mobile terminal included in the vehicle or separate from the vehicle, thus giving users increased flexibility while maximizing simplicity and usability for the user or other personnel obtaining the data. Once an occupant's best-fit body arrangement is determined, it may be altered by changing the predetermined criteria to achieve optimum comfort, safety, and therapeutic benefit as well as used for providing improved comfort on a continuous basis and/or in response to detected or predicted vehicle, road, or atmospheric conditions.