Occupant Restraint System with Automated Electric Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional seat restraint mechanisms in mass transit vehicles require manual verification to ensure occupants are properly latched, which is time-consuming and prone to human error, as occupants can unlatch restraints without notification, compromising safety and compliance with regulations.

Innovation Solution

An occupant restraint system that includes a processor-controlled electric lock mechanism integrated with a latchable buckle and occupancy sensors, allowing for wireless communication and automatic locking/unlocking of restraints, ensuring all occupants are securely restrained with minimal attendant intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual verification of seat restraints is used, then occupants can be secured with simple mechanisms, but safety monitoring becomes time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoringVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual verification with an automated electronic monitoring system that uses sensors, processors, and communication networks to detect and report restraint status, eliminating the need for attendants to manually check each seat

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by monitoring restraint status through sensors and immediately communicating latch status to attendants via display devices, enabling real-time safety verification without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If manual latch mechanisms are used, then device complexity is reduced, but occupants can unlatch restraints without notification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestraint mechanismVSAvoidrestraint security
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces simple mechanical latches with electronically monitored latch mechanisms that incorporate sensors and communication capabilities to detect when restraints are unlatched and notify attendants automatically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary monitoring layer between the occupant and the restraint mechanism, where sensors and communication networks act as mediators to detect unlatching events and transmit this information to attendants

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated locking systems are implemented, then safety and productivity are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestraint operation efficiencyVSAvoidlocking system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the automated restraint system into modular functional components including sensors, processors, communication modules, and display devices, allowing the system to be implemented incrementally and maintained independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses universal communication protocols and standardized sensor interfaces that can be applied across multiple seat types and restraint mechanisms, reducing overall system complexity through standardization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system efficiently and reliably secures multiple occupants by automating the locking process, reducing the burden on attendants and enhancing safety by providing real-time status updates and ensuring all restraints are properly engaged before and after travel.

Implementation Method 1

the electric lock mechanism includes an electromagnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnet: Electromagnet

Data Source

PatentEP3127762B1An occupant restraint system and method of operating
Publication Date: 2020.02.26 AMI IND INC
  • EP3127762B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3127762B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP3127762B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

An occupant restraint system (20) includes a plurality of occupant residences (22) each including a restraint assembly (34) having a latch mechanism (68) manually movable between a latched state (72) and an unlatched state (74) and an electric lock mechanism (42) movable from an unlocked state (74) to a locked state (76) when the latch mechanism (68) is in the latched state (72). A control console (28) includes an electronic display of the plurality of occupant residences (22) and a user interface (90) for actuating the electric lock mechanism (42) between the locked state (76) and the unlocked state (74). An occupancy tabulation system (32) is constructed and arranged to send a signal to the control console (28) indicative of occupied residences (102, 104) of the plurality of occupant residences (22) for displaying an occupied condition associated with the occupied residences (102, 104) on the electronic display.