Occupying Structures Reduce Machining Volume in Multi-Object Workpieces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machining multiple objects from a single workpiece is labor intensive and inefficient due to the need to load and unload individual workpieces from milling machines, resulting in excessive machining time and equipment wear.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the creation of a workpiece computer model with a temporary support frame and occupying structures that minimize the amount of material to be machined by strategically placing objects within the workpiece, reducing the volume of material that needs to be removed during machining.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple objects are machined from a single workpiece, then productivity increases, but the amount of material to be machined increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of objects produced per workpieceVSAvoidvolume of material to be machined
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by creating occupying structures in advance within the workpiece model. These structures are positioned to fill excess unoccupied regions before the actual machining process begins, thereby pre-determining the final machined shape and reducing the volume of material that needs to be removed during machining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of material volume by introducing occupying structures that alter the effective volume of the workpiece. By modifying the workpiece model to include these structures, the actual machining operation processes less material, effectively changing the volume parameter from the original excess material to the optimized reduced volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If occupying structures are added to fill excess unoccupied regions, then machining time is reduced, but the complexity of workpiece modeling increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining timeVSAvoidworkpiece modeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies self-service by automatically generating occupying structures through computer software. The software identifies excess unoccupied regions in the workpiece model and autonomously creates appropriate occupying structures to fill them, eliminating the need for manual intervention and reducing the perceived complexity for the user while still achieving the optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical modeling processes with computer-based software automation. Instead of physically modeling or manually calculating optimal workpiece configurations, the system uses computational algorithms to automatically generate occupying structures, substituting mechanical/manual operations with digital processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If occupying structures are generated automatically, then ease of operation improves, but software complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of occupying structure generationVSAvoidsoftware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The software system performs self-service by automatically identifying excess unoccupied regions and generating appropriate occupying structures without user intervention. This automation improves ease of operation as users simply need to provide the basic workpiece model and desired objects, while the software handles the complex optimization tasks independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The software acts as an intermediary between the user's simple input (workpiece model and object requirements) and the complex optimization process. It mediates by translating high-level user requirements into detailed occupying structure configurations, shielding users from software complexity while providing automated functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10401824B2Methods and software for reducing machining equipment usage when machining multiple objects from a single workpiece
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 PROTO LABS INC
  • US10401824B2 patent drawing
  • US10401824B2 patent drawing
  • US10401824B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for providing a workpiece computer model including a plurality of objects defined in a body of material. A temporary support frame is provided as part of a two-sided machining process in which the workpiece is partially milled from an obverse side. The machine-control instructions are also based on one or more occupying structures added to the workpiece to fill in one or more excess unoccupied regions of the workpiece that would otherwise be machined away during machining of the objects. Providing such occupying structure(s) reduces the amount of machining that needs to be performed.