Oxidative Coupling of Methane Reactor Startup Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) reaction for producing ethane and ethylene is inefficient due to high reaction temperatures and excessive heat production, leading to catalyst deactivation and reduced selectivity of ethylene production, with existing methods requiring complex and costly reactor designs and inefficient cooling methods.

Innovation Solution

The OCM reaction is ignited and maintained in an autothermal state by controlling the feed gas parameters, such as temperature and CH4:O2 molar ratio, to avoid transient high temperatures that can destroy the catalyst, using the feed gas as a coolant to manage heat and enable high methane conversion in a single adiabatic reactor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If high reaction temperature is used to initiate the OCM reaction, then the reaction can proceed, but the catalyst is destroyed or deactivated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction temperatureVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst bed is preheated to a high temperature (700-950°C) before introducing the methane feed. This preliminary heating action allows the catalyst to reach the necessary activation temperature without exposing it to the full thermal stress of the exothermic reaction, thereby enabling reaction initiation while preserving catalyst integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The reaction is initiated in a controlled sequence: first preheating the catalyst bed, then introducing methane feed. This periodic or sequential action pattern allows the system to transition from a stable preheating phase to the reactive phase, avoiding simultaneous thermal shock and reaction onset that would destroy the catalyst

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If excess heat is produced from the exothermic reaction, then the reaction proceeds vigorously, but selectivity of ethylene production is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidselectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The exothermic heat that would normally cause runaway reactions and reduce selectivity is converted into a beneficial preheating source. The heat from the exothermic reaction is used to preheat the incoming methane feed and maintain catalyst bed temperature, eliminating the need for external heating and allowing operation at lower feed temperatures that improve selectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The system operates by changing the temperature parameter of the feed gas. By controlling the feed temperature and using the exothermic heat to maintain optimal reaction temperature, the system achieves high productivity while maintaining high selectivity for ethylene production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If methane conversion is limited to less than 15% in a cooled multi-tubular reactor, then runaway reaction is avoided, but productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction controlVSAvoidmethane conversion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the heat generated by the exothermic reaction itself to preheat the incoming feed and maintain catalyst temperature. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external cooling systems and allows the reactor to operate at higher conversions without runaway reactions, as the heat is internally managed rather than externally controlled

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The feed gas is preheated before entering the reactor using heat from the exothermic reaction. This preliminary heating action ensures that the reaction proceeds at optimal temperatures throughout the catalyst bed, allowing higher methane conversion while maintaining reaction control and avoiding hot spots that would cause runaway conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Temperature

If complex reactor designs with multiple catalytic beds and heat exchangers are used, then temperature control is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoidreactor design
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex heat exchanger and multi-bed reactor design is replaced by extracting and utilizing the exothermic heat directly within a single catalytic bed. The heat management function is extracted from separate cooling systems and integrated into the reaction process itself, simplifying the overall reactor design while maintaining effective temperature control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The functions of heating, cooling, and reaction are merged into a single integrated process. The exothermic heat from the reaction is directly used to preheat the feed and maintain catalyst temperature, combining multiple thermal management functions into one simple reactor configuration rather than requiring separate heat exchangers and multiple catalytic beds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for stable operation at higher methane conversion rates while preventing catalyst deactivation, reducing capital costs and improving selectivity of C2+ hydrocarbons production, enabling efficient ethylene production at lower temperatures and reduced reactor complexity.

Implementation Method 1

supplying feed gas for the oxidative coupling reaction to the reactor at a rate and at a low enough temperature to compensate for the heat of reaction generated in the reactor. In this way, the feed gas serves as a coolant as it is heated to a higher temperature by the heat generated by the oxidative coupling reaction in the reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat absorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 2

oxidative conversion of methane to ethylene or ethane is exothermic... the heat of reaction generated in the reactor... the heat generated by the oxidative coupling reaction in the reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Implementation Method 3

the heat of reaction generated in the reactor... compensate for the heat of reaction generated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat generation: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10995044B2Ignition of oxidative coupling of methane while reducing ratio of methane to oxygen
Publication Date: 2021.05.04 SABIC GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES BV
  • US10995044B2 patent drawing
  • US10995044B2 patent drawing
  • US10995044B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of performing a startup of an oxidative coupling of methane reaction to produce C2+ hydrocarbons are described. The methods can include incrementally varying startup parameters of the oxidative methane reactor and using the feed gas as a coolant such that high C2+ hydrocarbon selectivity is achieved.