Automated Data Validation System for OCR Documents

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual data entry in electronic documents often results in errors and inconsistencies, requiring significant repetitive clerical work for validation, especially in OCR-processed documents, which can be time-consuming and costly.

Innovation Solution

An automated system and method for validating data fields in electronic documents using a multi-layered validation approach that checks data integrity, applies business rules, and cross-validates across similar, related, and duplicate fields, reducing human intervention and improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual data entry and review is performed, then data accuracy can be maintained, but time consumption and labor cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-validation by automatically comparing data fields against each other and against business rules without requiring manual review. The validation system checks consistency across duplicate fields, verifies data types and formats, and identifies discrepancies automatically, allowing the system to serve its own validation needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with an automated computer-based validation system. The system uses software algorithms to automatically compare data fields, check for inconsistencies, and validate against business rules, substituting human clerical work with electronic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of time

If automated validation is implemented, then time consumption is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime consumptionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system is divided into multiple independent validation modules that can be applied sequentially. Each module handles a specific aspect of validation (e.g., data type validation, format validation, cross-field consistency validation), making the overall complex system manageable through modular decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system is designed as a universal framework that can validate multiple types of data fields across different document types using the same core mechanisms. The system handles various validation scenarios (duplicate fields, related fields, business rules) through a unified approach, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If multiple validation layers are applied, then data accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation checks that can be completed quickly to filter out obviously incorrect data before applying more complex validation layers. Simple data type and format validations are performed first to eliminate erroneous records early in the process, reducing the burden on subsequent validation stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system applies validation to all data fields (excessive action) but allows different levels of validation intensity based on the field's importance and the document type. Critical fields receive full validation while less critical fields receive simplified validation, optimizing the balance between accuracy and processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11720961B2Validation method and system to improve data accuracy
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 SOFTWORKS AI LLC
  • US11720961B2 patent drawing
  • US11720961B2 patent drawing
  • US11720961B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated method and system for validating (cross-validating) data fields in an electronic document, such as a document that has been passed through an optical character recognition (“OCR”) or Intelligent Document Recognition (“IDR”) system or software, to improve accuracy of the electronic document.