Automated Medication Administration System with OCR Patient Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems in healthcare facilities face challenges in accurately verifying and managing medication administration, particularly for IV drugs, due to manual errors and inconsistencies in institutional guidelines, leading to potential medication errors and adverse drug events.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for analyzing medical treatment data to determine and adjust institutional guidelines, utilizing a network of medication administration devices, a central processor, and a database to compile and analyze treatment parameter values, ensuring accurate and efficient medication delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual transcription of patient information from identification bracelets is used, then patient identification can be performed, but transcription errors occur leading to medication errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient identification processVSAvoidaccuracy of patient identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual transcription (mechanical human operation) with automated optical character recognition (OCR) technology using a camera to capture and digitally process the patient identification bracelet information. This substitution eliminates human error in transcription while maintaining ease of patient identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital copy of the patient identification information from the physical bracelet through image capture and OCR processing. This digital copy can be stored and referenced without requiring manual rewriting, thereby eliminating transcription errors while preserving the identification function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If manual entry of treatment parameters is used, then medication administration can be configured, but errors in parameter entry reduce accuracy and effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemedication administration configurationVSAvoidaccuracy of treatment parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual entry of treatment parameters with automated parameter extraction from the digital copy of the prescription and institutional guidelines database. The system automatically retrieves and configures parameters such as dosage, frequency, and administration route, eliminating human error in parameter entry while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-configuration by automatically extracting treatment parameters from the prescription and comparing them with institutional guidelines. The medication administration device configures itself without requiring manual input from healthcare providers, thereby ensuring parameter accuracy while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If automated systems with bar codes are used to identify patients and medications, then verification accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a multi-functional system where a single device performs multiple functions: capturing images of the patient identification bracelet, performing OCR to extract text, storing digital copies, retrieving institutional guidelines, and configuring medication administration parameters. This universal approach maintains verification accuracy while reducing overall system complexity compared to multiple separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of manufacture

If institutional guidelines are established through polling doctors, then guidelines can be created, but the guidelines may not be consistent with actual best practice

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguideline creation processVSAvoidconsistency with best practice
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops where actual medication administration data and patient outcomes are continuously collected and used to refine and update institutional guidelines. This feedback mechanism ensures that guidelines remain consistent with actual best practices by learning from real-world application and outcomes, rather than relying solely on periodic polling of doctors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8020564B2System and method for analyzing medical treatment data
Publication Date: 2011.09.20 CAREFUSION 303 INC
  • US8020564B2 patent drawing
  • US8020564B2 patent drawing
  • US8020564B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for compiling and analyzing treatment parameters associated with medical treatments provided to a plurality of patients is provided. A report of the analysis may be provided to a technician or physician for determining medical treatment guidelines representing acceptable values for a selected treatment parameter in accordance with the analysis. The system may further automatically determine medical treatment guidelines and/or adjust preestablished medical treatment guidelines in accordance with the analysis.