Character Recognition Strikethrough Noise Rejection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data input systems incorrectly identify scan noise as strikethrough, leading to rejection of accurate character recognition results, which can result in incorrect cancellation of character strings marked for deletion.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that includes a character recognition section, a strikethrough detection section, a matching section, and a control section to verify the accuracy of character recognition results by matching them with human input, even when a strikethrough is detected, ensuring correct character recognition results are not rejected unnecessarily.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If scan noise is detected as strikethrough, then the character recognition result is rejected, but the correct character recognition result is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of strikethrough detectionVSAvoidloss of correct character recognition result
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs matching between character recognition results and human inputs to obtain feedback on the accuracy of recognition. When a strikethrough is detected, the system uses this feedback mechanism to verify whether the character recognition result should be rejected, preventing erroneous rejection due to noise detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The matching section acts as an intermediary between the strikethrough detection and the final rejection decision. It compares character recognition results with human inputs to determine whether the detected strikethrough is genuine or noise, thereby mediating the rejection process to avoid losing correct recognition results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If character recognition result is rejected when strikethrough is detected, then false positive noise is rejected, but actual strikethrough cases are also rejected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of strikethrough identificationVSAvoidreliability of character recognition result usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The matching process provides feedback by comparing automated character recognition with human inputs. This feedback allows the system to distinguish between genuine strikethroughs (where human input would differ from recognition) and noise (where human input matches recognition), improving both precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the decision parameter from a simple binary rejection based on strikethrough detection to a comparative parameter based on matching results. By evaluating whether recognition results match human inputs, the system adjusts its decision criteria to improve both precision and reliability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple human verifications are required, then accuracy is improved, but processing time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of character recognitionVSAvoidprocessing time for verification
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and utilizes existing human inputs (such as manual corrections or annotations) as verification data without requiring additional human verification steps. By taking out and reusing available human input data for matching, the system maintains accuracy while avoiding the time and cost of multiple verifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-verification by matching its own character recognition results against available human inputs. This self-service mechanism allows the system to validate its results without requiring external human verification, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing processing time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11100356B2Information processing apparatus and non-transitory computer readable medium storing program
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP
  • US11100356B2 patent drawing
  • US11100356B2 patent drawing
  • US11100356B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes a character recognition section that performs character recognition of an input image to output a character recognition result, a receiving section that receives an input of a character recognition result by a person on the input image, a detection section that detects a strikethrough from the input image, a matching section that matches the character recognition result output by the character recognition section with the character recognition result by the person, which is received by the receiving section, and a control section that performs control for causing the matching section to perform matching so as to obtain a final character recognition result based on a result of the matching, in a case where the detection section detects the strikethrough.