OCT Motion Correction via Guidepost A-Scan Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) systems face challenges in correcting for patient motion during data acquisition, leading to distorted images, as existing methods require additional optical systems for eye tracking or rely on landmarks that may not be present in diseased tissue.

Innovation Solution

A method that acquires a sparse set of guidepost A-scans quickly to track sample motion, allowing for comparison with image A-scans to determine transverse and longitudinal displacements, enabling correction of image data to form a 3D image free of motion artifacts without additional optical systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If additional optical systems for eye tracking are used to correct sample motion, then motion correction capability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion correction capabilityVSAvoidoptical system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The OCT system uses its own imaging capability to detect motion by comparing guidepost A-scans with image A-scans, eliminating the need for separate eye tracking systems. The system serves its own motion detection needs through self-comparison of optical scattering profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The OCT beam and imaging system perform dual functions: both acquiring diagnostic image data and detecting sample motion through guidepost comparison. The same optical system is used for both imaging and motion tracking purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If additional optical systems for eye tracking are used to correct sample motion, then motion correction capability is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion correction capabilityVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The OCT system uses its own imaging capability to detect motion by comparing guidepost A-scans with image A-scans, eliminating the need for separate eye tracking systems. The system serves its own motion detection needs through self-comparison of optical scattering profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Guidepost A-scans serve as intermediaries to detect motion. These sparse reference measurements mediate between the OCT system and sample motion, providing motion information without requiring additional tracking hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If landmarks are used for motion detection, then motion tracking is simplified, but reliability decreases when landmarks are absent in diseased tissue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion detection simplicityVSAvoidmotion detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Guidepost A-scans serve as intermediaries to detect motion. These sparse reference measurements mediate between the OCT system and sample motion, providing motion information without requiring additional tracking hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The method compares optical scattering profiles (parameters) between guidepost and image A-scans to detect motion. By changing from landmark-based detection to scattering profile comparison, the system maintains reliability across different tissue conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If a dense set of A-scans is acquired for high-quality imaging, then image quality is improved, but acquisition time increases making the system more sensitive to motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidacquisition time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The imaging data is segmented into two types: sparse guidepost A-scans for motion detection and dense image A-scans for diagnostic quality. This segmentation allows motion correction without sacrificing image quality or excessively increasing acquisition time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Guidepost A-scans are acquired preliminarily to establish reference positions before acquiring the full set of image A-scans. This preliminary sampling enables subsequent motion correction of the complete image data set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively corrects minor movements during OCT image acquisition, improving image quality by aligning image data with its correct locations, reducing motion artifacts and maintaining simplicity and cost-effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

OCT is a method of interferometry that determines the scattering profile of a sample along the OCT beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 2

OCT is a method of interferometry that determines the scattering profile of a sample along the OCT beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterferometry: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS7755769B2Method of motion correction in optical coherence tomography imaging
Publication Date: 2010.07.13 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC INC
  • US7755769B2 patent drawing
  • US7755769B2 patent drawing
  • US7755769B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image data set acquired by an optical coherence tomography (OCT) system is corrected for effects due to motion of the sample. A first set of A-scans is acquired within a time short enough to avoid any significant motion of the sample. A second more extensive set of A-scans is acquired over an overlapping region on the sample. Significant sample motion may occur during acquisition of the second set. A-scans from the first set are matched with A-scans from the second set, based on similarity between the longitudinal optical scattering profiles they contain. Such matched pairs of A-scans are likely to correspond to the same region in the sample. Comparison of the OCT scanner coordinates that produced each A-scan in a matching pair, in conjunction with any shift in the longitudinal scattering profiles between the pair of A-scans, reveals the displacement of the sample between acquisition of the first and second A-scans in the pair. Estimates of the sample displacement are used to correct the transverse and longitudinal coordinates of the A-scans in the second set, to form a motion-corrected OCT data set.