Unified Ocular Image Network for Classification-Led Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional deep neural networks (DNNs) used for image classification and segmentation in medical imaging require significant computational resources, large datasets for training, and face privacy concerns when deployed centrally, leading to inconsistent outcomes and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A deep learning model adapted to simultaneously perform classification and segmentation, integrating classification outputs to refine segmentation processes, reducing the need for separate models and computational resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate deep neural networks are used for classification and segmentation, then each task can be performed independently, but the outcomes become inconsistent and inaccuracies increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification and segmentation accuracyVSAvoidmodel architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines classification and segmentation tasks into a single unified deep neural network model. The network architecture integrates multiple output heads that simultaneously perform classification (identifying the type of ocular disease) and segmentation (delineating affected retinal layers), allowing both tasks to benefit from shared feature extraction and consistent parameter learning, thereby improving outcome consistency and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified neural network model serves multiple functions: it performs feature extraction, classification of ocular diseases, and segmentation of retinal layers all within a single model framework. This multi-functional approach allows the model to leverage common patterns across tasks while maintaining specialized capabilities for each function, reducing the need for separate models and improving overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a large amount of data is used to train reliable models, then model performance improves, but the computational resources and GPUs required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The training process is segmented into two phases: pre-training on large public datasets to learn general features, and fine-tuning on smaller private datasets to adapt to specific applications. This segmentation allows the model to benefit from large-scale data without requiring all training data to be processed simultaneously, reducing computational resource requirements while maintaining model reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The model undergoes pre-training on large public datasets before deployment, performing the computationally intensive learning phase in advance. This preliminary action allows the model to acquire robust features beforehand, reducing the computational burden during actual deployment and enabling reliable performance with fewer resources during operational use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If a centralized model is deployed publicly over the internet, then accessibility improves, but privacy concerns arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accessibilityVSAvoidprivacy concerns
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows for localized deployment of the model at individual healthcare institutions, enabling each location to run the model locally on their own infrastructure. This approach maintains high accessibility and ease of operation while ensuring that patient data remains local and private, eliminating the need to upload sensitive medical images to centralized public servers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a federated learning framework where the centralized model acts as an intermediary that coordinates training across multiple distributed locations without centralizing the actual patient data. Each institution trains the model locally on their private datasets, and only model parameter updates are shared, thereby maintaining both accessibility and privacy through the intermediary coordination layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260038239A1System and method for processing an image
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 MINDPLUS AI LTD
  • US20260038239A1 patent drawing
  • US20260038239A1 patent drawing
  • US20260038239A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for processing an image including an image gateway adapted to receive one or more input images, a learning network configured to perform feature extraction on the one or more input image, and; simultaneously perform a classification function and a segmentation function on the input image.