OFDM Bit and Power Loading for Throughput Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems typically use coarse throughput increments in response to signal-to-noise ratio changes, limiting the ability to achieve higher modulation rates without increasing redundancy, while maintaining a fixed bit error rate for multiple subcarriers.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a bit and power loading algorithm based on channel state information, combined with trellis coded modulation, to dynamically adjust subcarrier powers and rates, allowing for finer throughput adjustments without additional redundancy, and optimizing for a fixed bit error rate across varying signal-to-noise ratios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If coarse throughput increments (6 dB increments) are used in OFDM systems, then system complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but throughput precision and adaptability to varying signal-to-noise ratios deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidthroughput precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single OFDM stream into multiple parallel substreams, each processed independently with its own modulation and coding scheme. This segmentation allows each substream to be optimized for specific signal-to-noise ratio conditions, enabling finer throughput control without increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of active substreams and their respective modulation orders based on real-time signal-to-noise ratio measurements. This dynamic adaptation enables continuous throughput adjustment rather than coarse discrete steps, resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and throughput precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If higher modulation rates are used to increase throughput, then productivity is improved, but bit error rate increases unless additional redundancy is added

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidbit error rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different substreams are assigned different modulation orders and coding rates based on their individual channel conditions. Substreams experiencing better signal-to-noise ratio use higher modulation rates for maximum throughput, while substreams in poorer conditions use more robust modulation with higher redundancy, maintaining overall bit error rate performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously - modulation order, coding rate, and number of active substreams - to optimize the throughput-reliability tradeoff. By adjusting these parameters based on signal-to-noise ratio, the system achieves higher productivity without sacrificing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If additional redundancy is added to maintain fixed bit error rate at higher modulation rates, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and loss of information increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebit error rateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding redundancy to a single high-rate stream, the system segments the data into multiple substreams with different redundancy levels. This allows redundancy to be applied selectively only where needed, reducing overall system complexity compared to uniform redundancy across all data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If additional redundancy is added to maintain fixed bit error rate, then reliability is improved, but throughput decreases due to loss of information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebit error rateVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Redundancy is applied locally to specific substreams based on their channel conditions rather than uniformly to all data. Substreams in good conditions use minimal redundancy for maximum throughput, while substreams in poor conditions use higher redundancy to maintain reliability, optimizing the overall throughput-reliability tradeoff

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7688766B2Modulation scheme for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing systems or the like
Publication Date: 2010.03.30 APPLE INC
  • US7688766B2 patent drawing
  • US7688766B2 patent drawing
  • US7688766B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Briefly, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, bit and power loading may be utilized to select a modulation rate and subcarrier power scaling based on channel state information. As a result, a higher data rate may be utilized for a given signal-to-noise ratio while maintaining a constant bit error rate.