OFDM Symbol Interleaving Switching for Error Correction Tradeoffs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems, particularly in 5G technology, face challenges in efficiently managing bit-level and tone-level interleaving for OFDM symbols across code blocks, which affects error correction and resource utilization due to varying factors like bit load, processing time, and transmission schemes.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for dynamically switching between bit-level and tone-level interleaving for each OFDM symbol based on factors such as bit load, MIMO transmission rank, modulation and coding schemes, and processing requirements, allowing for the selection of either interleaving technique or no interleaving, to optimize error correction and resource efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If bit-level interleaving is applied to all OFDM symbols, then error correction performance is improved, but processing complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction performanceVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic switching between bit-level interleaving and tone-level interleaving based on real-time channel conditions, modulation schemes, and code block sizes. The system adapts the interleaving method per OFDM symbol rather than using a fixed approach, allowing optimization of processing time while maintaining error correction performance when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different interleaving methods to different OFDM symbols based on their specific characteristics such as modulation scheme, code block size, and channel conditions. Instead of uniform bit-level interleaving across all symbols, the system selectively applies bit-level interleaving only where it provides necessary error correction benefits, reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If bit-level interleaving is used for all code blocks, then burst error resilience is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburst error resilienceVSAvoidinterleaver complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects between bit-level and tone-level interleaving based on transmission conditions, avoiding the need for complex bit-level interleaving when tone-level interleaving suffices. This reduces device complexity while maintaining burst error resilience when required by channel conditions or modulation schemes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the interleaving parameter (method type) based on transmission conditions, modulation schemes, and code block characteristics. By adjusting this parameter dynamically, the system achieves burst error resilience only when necessary, reducing overall device complexity compared to always using bit-level interleaving.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If tone-level interleaving is used instead of bit-level interleaving, then processing time is reduced, but error correction performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoiderror correction performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between tone-level and bit-level interleaving based on real-time assessment of error correction needs versus processing time requirements. When channel conditions or modulation schemes indicate high error risk, the system transitions to bit-level interleaving to maintain performance while otherwise using the faster tone-level approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies bit-level interleaving selectively to specific OFDM symbols that require enhanced error correction based on their local characteristics such as modulation scheme complexity, code block size, and channel quality. Other symbols use the faster tone-level interleaving, achieving local optimization of error correction without sacrificing overall processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic switching between interleaving methods is implemented, then adaptability to different transmission conditions is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to transmission conditionsVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic switching by changing the interleaving method parameter based on transmission conditions, modulation schemes, and code block characteristics. This parameter-based control approach provides high adaptability while keeping control complexity manageable through rule-based selection rather than complex optimization algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10305633B2Per-symbol K-bit interleaver
Publication Date: 2019.05.28 QUALCOMM INC
  • US10305633B2 patent drawing
  • US10305633B2 patent drawing
  • US10305633B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides techniques for performing bit-level interleaving for orthogonal frequency-divisional multiplexing (OFDM) symbols across a plurality of code blocks. In some aspects, a transmitting device may dynamically switch between bit-level interleaving and tone-level interleaving for each OFDM symbol based on factors such as number of bits that are carried in each tone, size of each code block, the processing time requirements of the transmitting device and/or the receiving device, or the transmitting device preference.