Link Adaptation Using Interference Metrics in OFDM Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current OFDM communication systems face challenges in accurately adapting modulation and coding schemes due to limited information about receiver performance, leading to suboptimal data transmission rates under varying channel conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that determine an interference metric by calculating the mean and standard deviation of link quality measurements, allowing for the selection of an appropriate modulation and coding scheme to improve transmission efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If packet error rate (PER) is used for MCS selection, then the system can adapt to channel conditions, but the accuracy of MCS selection is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMCS selection accuracyVSAvoidReceiver performance information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the receiver provides channel quality information (CQI) and interference measurements back to the transmitter. This feedback loop enables the transmitter to accurately determine the interference metric and select appropriate MCS, resolving the information loss about receiver performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the simple PER-based mechanical selection system with a more sophisticated interference metric calculation system that uses statistical measurements (mean and standard deviation of link quality measurements) to determine MCS, thereby improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If higher data rates are used, then transmission efficiency improves, but reliability decreases under varying channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission rateVSAvoidtransmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic MCS selection where the modulation and coding scheme is continuously adjusted based on real-time interference metrics and channel conditions. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize between data rate and reliability by selecting higher MCS when conditions permit and lowering them when interference increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter used for MCS selection from simple PER to an interference metric based on statistical characteristics (mean and standard deviation) of link quality measurements. This parameter change enables more nuanced control over the trade-off between transmission rate and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If MCS selection is based on PER only, then the system is simple to implement, but the level of accuracy is relatively low

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMCS selection complexityVSAvoidMCS selection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds another dimension to MCS selection by introducing interference metric calculation based on statistical measurements (mean and standard deviation) of link quality measurements. This transforms the selection process from a single-dimensional PER-based approach to a multi-dimensional approach that considers both average quality and variability, thereby improving accuracy without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS9106371B1Link adaptation for OFDM systems
Publication Date: 2015.08.11 NXP USA INC
  • US9106371B1 patent drawing
  • US9106371B1 patent drawing
  • US9106371B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method implemented in a communication device, an interference metric associated with a communication link is determined. Determining the interference metric includes obtaining a plurality of measurements indicative of quality of the communication link, and calculating the interference metric using (i) a mean of the plurality of measurements and (ii) a standard deviation of the plurality of measurements. A modulation and coding scheme is selected based on at least the interference metric, and at least one packet is caused to be modulated and coded according to the selected modulation and coding scheme prior to transmission over the communication link.