OFDMA Peer-to-Peer Scheduling Near-Far Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional TDMA scheduling techniques are ineffective in OFDMA networks that facilitate peer-to-peer communication, leading to significant near-far issues due to the absence of a central base station, which desensitizes receivers to low-power signals from high-power transmitters.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of proactive and reactive scheduling methods in OFDMA systems, where a base station generates resource map information elements and grant metric information elements to gather performance metrics from stations, allowing for the creation of peer sets and allocation of resources to avoid near-far interference by isolating high-power peer stations in the time domain.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional TDMA scheduling techniques are used in OFDMA networks, then resource allocation is simplified, but near-far problems occur due to lack of central base station control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling complexityVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a coordinator station as an intermediary entity that performs scheduling functions previously handled by a central base station. The coordinator collects information from stations, determines resource allocations, and manages peer-to-peer communications, thereby resolving near-far problems without requiring full centralization while maintaining scheduling effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic scheduling where resource allocations are determined based on real-time channel conditions and station requirements. The coordinator continuously updates scheduling decisions based on feedback information, enabling adaptive resource distribution that prevents near-far issues while optimizing network performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If high-power transmitters are allowed to transmit simultaneously with low-power transmitters, then system throughput increases, but receivers become desensitized to low-power signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem throughputVSAvoidnear-far interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the time-frequency resource space into distinct allocation groups for different stations based on their power levels and channel conditions. By dividing resources into separate time slots and frequency channels for high-power and low-power transmitters, the system prevents mutual interference while maintaining overall throughput efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The coordinator performs preliminary scheduling decisions before actual transmissions occur, determining optimal resource allocations in advance. By pre-calculating and assigning resources based on predicted channel conditions and power levels, the system prevents near-far interference before it can affect reception quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If centralized scheduling is implemented to prevent near-far problems, then communication reliability improves, but system complexity and overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coordinator station serves as a distributed intermediary that performs scheduling functions locally rather than requiring centralized control from a base station. This approach maintains reliable scheduling while reducing overall system complexity by enabling autonomous peer-to-peer resource allocation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables stations to self-manage their resource allocations through the coordinator's facilitation. Stations provide information about their needs and channel conditions, and the coordinator automatically determines appropriate resource assignments, reducing the need for complex centralized control while maintaining scheduling reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8982846B2Proactive scheduling methods and apparatus to enable peer-to-peer communication links in a wireless OFDMA system
Publication Date: 2015.03.17 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
  • US8982846B2 patent drawing
  • US8982846B2 patent drawing
  • US8982846B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods and apparatus are provided for scheduling resources in Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) communication networks for “direct link” or peer-to-peer communications among stations operating therein so that OFDMA resources can be allocated to a transmitter station for a peer-to-peer communication session with a receiver station such that near-far issues caused by peer-to-peer communication are reduced/avoided. The disclosed technologies can prevent peer-to-peer communication links using different sub-channels within the same time slot from creating near-far issues for other receiver stations that are within communication range.